acs75 wrote:Ghost wrote:acs75 wrote:If you want an AR-15 buy a 308. If you really need to push it.
You should buy that POF one and post up a review. Pretty mixed reviews on them.
lol I can say the same for 6.5 grendal
You do say a lot
acs75 wrote:Ghost wrote:acs75 wrote:If you want an AR-15 buy a 308. If you really need to push it.
You should buy that POF one and post up a review. Pretty mixed reviews on them.
lol I can say the same for 6.5 grendal
acs75 wrote:Ghost wrote:acs75 wrote:Not for deer. But you brought up coyotes
You can get this in AR-15
http://www.accurateshooter.com/cartridge-guides/6mmbr/
Interesting the article mentions the 6PPC since there's a certain round that used that for the design. Hint, that round was the Grendel.
Yes I know that. What's your point?
acs75 wrote:As a quick side note 238 replies to this thread. Gotta be up there on number of post?
Ghost wrote:acs75 wrote:As a quick side note 238 replies to this thread. Gotta be up there on number of post?
Might as well keep it going
crbutler wrote:Utah requires 500 ft lbs at 100 yards with a minimum of .24 caliber in a handgun. Rifle is any center fire.
Ok. Legal is a .17 hornet rifle. Don't be stupid.
How many elk have you shot? How much money would be sufficient for hunt cost before you would start moving up from a 6.5 Grendel (meaning a guided hunt where most outfitters say if you draw blood, that's your animal, you are done with a wounded bull)?
The Grendel is a good long range steel swatter, a good all around deer/pronghorn round, but a marginal elk round, and in my opinion, an unethical long range elk round. It's also not a moose cartridge. Yes it can kill anything that walks, as can a .22 short... but that does not make it a good hunting round.
Before you trot out that canard about Europeans and the 6.5x55, remember that the European moose is about 70% the size of a Alaskan or Siberian moose, they are shot at very close range, and they are generally hunting with dogs (elghunds) so a wounded animal is almost always found. The 6.5 when used on moose is generally with a 160 grain bullet, which is also a bit out of the range of the Grendel's oal.
As to which upper, whichever works better for you. The cheap one may shoot well, while the expensive one may be so so. Personally, I have found you generally get what you pay for, but then again, fortunately for me $200 on my hunting rifle is not a matter of significant debate so I am not the guy to ask about budget choices.
From what I am seeing, yukonjasper is after an AR deer and maybe pronghorn gun as a range rifle. The Grendel will work excellently for that. I realize most are not going to do the level and amount of traveling hunting I do, which colors my thinking a bit, but of the new guys I see in elk hunts, all of them are hauling new .300 or .338s so it seems that if you can afford the $5000 for the hunt, you can afford a new gun for elk. All of the guys I have met hunting elk with a Grendel (all one of them) were industry comped writers. What he wrote was rather different than what I heard from the guide, and that really colors my thinking on that rifle choice. I will go so far as to say even if you paid for me to hunt elk or moose with a Grendel, I would not. I have too much respect for the animal.
acs75 wrote:Ghost are you familiar with the 6mmbr? I know lil. But as with the 6.5 grendal it's a nice lil cartridge for AR-15.
acs75 wrote:Even though I'm not a fan of Erud. He may have some Good opinions on it. Being he is a competition guy. Maybe ran into few guys using it.
acs75 wrote:We made it to 300!
Ghost wrote:acs75 wrote:We made it to 300!
Looks like 250 to me. You really like your 300's, eh
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests