.223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Discussion of rifles, shotguns, and muzzleloaders

.223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby NACHO on Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:27 pm

NACHO
 
Posts: 14 [View]
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:26 pm

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby The Lance on Tue Jan 08, 2013 9:50 pm

very interesting indeed. my upper chews through Wolf ammo like nothing, Good to know that saving money on the ammo leads to a new barrel and still being cheaper.

it's too bad they didn't do a test with different barrel types and see which one is the best
I'm not down with the republican party, or the democratic party. I represent the MI6
User avatar
The Lance
 
Posts: 578 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 4:53 pm

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby FJ540 on Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:55 pm

I'd love to see that repeated with a hard chromed 4150 barrel and a 416 stainless.
User avatar
FJ540
 
Posts: 6836 [View]
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:44 pm
Location: Rock Ridge

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby oneunder on Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:59 am

That site does some awesome research on ammo.

Their article on .223 vs 5.56 is really good too:
http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/5-56-vs-223/
oneunder
 
Posts: 174 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:59 am
Location: Andover

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby JohnGageMN on Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:59 am

Both excellent articles. Nice to be able to read about all of the methodology in the research and not just a few lines about results.
<= Helping save stupid people from themselves since 1997.

crbutler wrote:About this time frame I began to look on Glock owners as being incestuous relatives of Lucifer.
User avatar
JohnGageMN
 
Posts: 241 [View]
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2010 1:46 pm
Location: Plymouth, MN

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby Scoobyvroom on Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:18 pm

FJ540 wrote:I'd love to see that repeated with a hard chromed 4150 barrel and a 416 stainless.


Is hard chrome something different than regular chrome? They say in the article, that the barrels are chrome lined.


Great article btw...
User avatar
Scoobyvroom
 
Posts: 58 [View]
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:21 am

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby Mn01r6 on Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:27 pm

Great article and a great place to buy ammo back before the hoarding. Guaranteed in stock and shipped the same/next day.

NOT run on customer's money like some other places around the net. But unfortunately to keep ammo in stock they are charging crazy post-apocalyptic prices.
User avatar
Mn01r6
 
Posts: 1233 [View]
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 9:01 pm
Location: Playing Devil's Advocate

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby yuppiejr on Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:11 pm

JohnGageMN wrote:Both excellent articles. Nice to be able to read about all of the methodology in the research and not just a few lines about results.


+1, found them both well worth the read.. the impact on barrel life of the bimetal jacketed projectiles in most steel cased ammo was particularly illuminating.... the fact that the projectiles and not the steel cases typically cause the most expensive wear and tear on the gun are a key bit of information.

It's particularly timely given how many people are likely starting to consider or already have moved to steel cased ammo in their AR with the current supply situation.
User avatar
yuppiejr
 
Posts: 2853 [View]
Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 6:01 pm
Location: Blaine, MN

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby MNGunGuy on Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:02 pm

yuppiejr wrote:
JohnGageMN wrote:Both excellent articles. Nice to be able to read about all of the methodology in the research and not just a few lines about results.


+1, found them both well worth the read.. the impact on barrel life of the bimetal jacketed projectiles in most steel cased ammo was particularly illuminating.... the fact that the projectiles and not the steel cases typically cause the most expensive wear and tear on the gun are a key bit of information.

That made me feel particularly good about the 2 cases of Hornady Steel Match I ordered.
User avatar
MNGunGuy
 
Posts: 394 [View]
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 8:18 pm
Location: Woodbury, MN

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby FJ540 on Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:07 pm

Scoobyvroom wrote:
FJ540 wrote:I'd love to see that repeated with a hard chromed 4150 barrel and a 416 stainless.


Is hard chrome something different than regular chrome? They say in the article, that the barrels are chrome lined.


Great article btw...


Hard chrome would require lapping the barrel to get the edges knocked down. It's not as consistent of surface covering (builds up on shoulders), and so I'm pretty sure they're using one of the other deposition methods - but I haven't ever looked up the spec.

I'd also love to see some of the other industrial coatings applied to a barrel bore taken to this extreme. The salt bath nitride coating on my new DD barrel is amazing in how easy it is to clean.
User avatar
FJ540
 
Posts: 6836 [View]
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:44 pm
Location: Rock Ridge

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby photogpat on Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:13 pm

So...halfway through the test, the steel case barrels are shot out...did I get that right? As in, accuracy is worse than throwing a basketball down a hallway?
Nothing to see here. Continue swimming.
User avatar
photogpat
 
Posts: 3702 [View]
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:01 pm
Location: Securely barricaded

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby Collector1337420 on Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:19 pm

So, bottom line, it's more the steel core bullet, not the steel case, that causes more wear and tear, apparently.

So, if you shoot a lot, as in 1000s of rounds, shoot brass, unless you want to buy a lot of uppers. If you don't shoot a lot, and will never shoot more than 6000 rounds, then steel case won't make much of a difference.

Not going to happen, but I'd like to see this done with my CMMG 1/9 twist, WASP piston upper, which depending on who you ask, is "lower budget" than chrome lined barrels. I wonder how much better/worse it wears.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

"None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free."
Collector1337420
 
Posts: 399 [View]
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:18 pm
Location: Inver Grove Heights

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby FJ540 on Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:33 pm

$250-300 will buy you a decent new barrel. How much are you spending on ammo after 3K rds?
User avatar
FJ540
 
Posts: 6836 [View]
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:44 pm
Location: Rock Ridge

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby photogpat on Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:37 pm

'Cept the accuracy starts to diverge at 2k -- and goes substantially wacky after that.
Nothing to see here. Continue swimming.
User avatar
photogpat
 
Posts: 3702 [View]
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:01 pm
Location: Securely barricaded

Re: .223 brass-vs-steel-cased-ammo - research article

Postby FJ540 on Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:42 pm

Anyone here have a bore scope? I'm curious what my stainless barrel looks like after about 2000rds of mostly crap ammo.
User avatar
FJ540
 
Posts: 6836 [View]
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:44 pm
Location: Rock Ridge

Next

Return to Long Guns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron