Review: Diamondback DB9 ***Updated***

Discussion of handguns

Review: Diamondback DB9 ***Updated***

Postby TTS on Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:38 am

I am doing a long term review of the DB9 on my blog. Part one is up, let me know what you think.

At the range:

I took the DB9 to the Burnsville Pistol Range today for an initial break in and to get an impression of how it shot. After hearing some of the reports on the internet I was worried it would be plagued with malfunctions, it was not. The DB9 is a snappy little pistol that requires a FIRM grip. Shooting two handed at 21 feet I had no problem keeping all the shots in a tight group and head shots were, um, dare I say, easy? The recoil wasn't unmanageable but it was stout. The most uncomfortable thing about shooting it was the trigger bite in my index finger. If I used the pad of my index finger I got a nasty "bite" under recoil; using more of my finger on the trigger made it considerably better, but made accuracy more difficult.

http://www.minnesotaccw.com/1/post/2012/04/review-diamondback-db9-part-1.html
Last edited by TTS on Fri Apr 13, 2012 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Owner
Tactical Training Solutions
Specializing in Self Defense and Firearms Training
http://www.minnesotaccw.com
User avatar
TTS
 
Posts: 1233 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Lakeville

Re: Review: Diamondback DB9

Postby Thunderjohn on Mon Apr 02, 2012 11:10 am

TTS wrote:I am doing a long term review of the DB9 on my blog. Part one is up, let me know what you think.

At the range:

I took the DB9 to the Burnsville Pistol Range today for an initial break in and to get an impression of how it shot. After hearing some of the reports on the internet I was worried it would be plagued with malfunctions, it was not. The DB9 is a snappy little pistol that requires a FIRM grip. Shooting two handed at 21 feet I had no problem keeping all the shots in a tight group and head shots were, um, dare I say, easy? The recoil wasn't unmanageable but it was stout. The most uncomfortable thing about shooting it was the trigger bite in my index finger. If I used the pad of my index finger I got a nasty "bite" under recoil; using more of my finger on the trigger made it considerably better, but made accuracy more difficult.

http://www.minnesotaccw.com/1/post/2012/04/review-diamondback-db9-part-1.html


I'm glad you had good results as I too had been hearing less than great reviews.
FFL - http://www.Southwest-Arms.com
God, Family, Business
Emails to SouthwestArms@Gmail.com
Thunderjohn
 
Posts: 2369 [View]
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:23 pm
Location: Savage

Re: Review: Diamondback DB9

Postby TTS on Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:29 pm

Thanks John, let's hope they keep their quality up. It really is pushing the envelope for materials... I didn't mention in this blog post, but they do not recommend +P or ammo above 124 grains, the chamber walls are very thin.
Owner
Tactical Training Solutions
Specializing in Self Defense and Firearms Training
http://www.minnesotaccw.com
User avatar
TTS
 
Posts: 1233 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Lakeville

Re: Review: Diamondback DB9

Postby TTS on Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:56 pm

Well the DB9 died!

I am sad to say that my long term review of the DB9 has been cut short. Yesterday evening I had the chance to get the DB9 back to the range. I added a Houge Handall Jr. to the DB9 increase my grip on the small pistol, and it worked great! I was able to shoot 1 and 2 handed with no issues. However, about 75 rounds into my range session it started having failures to feed and then the gun just stopped feeding completely; I couldn't even hand cycle a round into the chamber. At this point I field stripped the DB9 and my problem became apparent. The recoil assembly had failed and the frame of the gun was eating itself apart, small chunks of plastic fell out of the frame when the slide was removed. All I had was my cell phone, so you will have to excuse the poor quality of the pictures. You can click on the pictures for an enlarged view.

Read More...http://www.minnesotaccw.com/1/post/2012/04/review-diamondback-db9-part-2.html

The Positive:
On the bright side Bill's Gun Shop & Range, where I purchased the DB9, went above and beyond to take care of me. Bills's has a very clear policy that new firearm are warrantied by the manufacturer, not Bill's. They will be happy to help with shipping the gun back to the manufacturer, but there are no returns on new firearms. I emailed Joe at Bill's, he is either the Owner or Manager, and explained what had happened with the pistol. Joe was very understanding and assured me that he would take care of the situation, he asked that I let him know when I would be in and he or his sales team lead would see what they could do for me. I made it clear that I respected their policy and was not demanding a refund or exchange.

I emailed Joe to ask if he would be in during a break I had between meetings; he responded that he would be gone but the sales team lead John would be fully briefed and handle the situation. I fully expected to walk in, have John tell me about their return policy and have the gun shipped back to Diamondback. (Upon it's return I would have sold it.) John asked me to show him what had happened, and I pointed out the recoil spring and frame damage. John shook his head and asked me what firearms I would rather have, I was shocked and told him I would have to look around for a few minutes.

After wandering the store I finally decided to get a Ruger LCR. John handled my paperwork, figured up the difference in price and shook my hand. Now that is customer service! I made sure to tell John to remove the extra magazine I had just paid $30 for and sell it, I no longer had a need for it.
Owner
Tactical Training Solutions
Specializing in Self Defense and Firearms Training
http://www.minnesotaccw.com
User avatar
TTS
 
Posts: 1233 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Lakeville


Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

cron