Stradawhovious wrote:so I will wait patiently for SS and a few others to chime in.

Stradawhovious wrote:so I will wait patiently for SS and a few others to chime in.
Stradawhovious wrote:bofe954 wrote: You probably can even just use 40 brass and load long.
I would love to hear a veteran reloader's take on this. I would assume that the two cases are designed for entirely different pressure spectrums, not to mention other physical differences between chambers and could present some interesting dangers if experimented with.
Then again I don't know, not having reloaded for either of them, so I will wait patiently for SS and a few others to chime in.
FJ540 wrote:Isn't the 10mm case like a 1/4" longer than the .40? That's way too much difference to be swapping brass in an auto - and I hardly know the first thing about reloading.
Stradawhovious wrote:FJ540 wrote:Isn't the 10mm case like a 1/4" longer than the .40? That's way too much difference to be swapping brass in an auto - and I hardly know the first thing about reloading.
Yup. That where many my concerns stemmed from.
EJSG19 wrote:You guys can hide behind my blast shield too if you want. Plenty of room.
bofe954 wrote:If you are serious about shooting start reloading. You can reload 10mm for around the same price as 45ACP, maybe less. You probably can even just use 40 brass and load long.
DeanC wrote:What do you think Sam: if you load 10mm up to spec in that gun, would you need one of those recoil dampening thingamabobs in that 1911 to keep from battering it to pieces?
bofe954 wrote: In general this site is the same two, three people arguing anyway.
You guys are right. Loading 40 to 1.18-1.22 is common, and you can load 10mm to the same pressure as 40 S+W if you want. I was confusing loading to a longer OAL with headspacing though, which isn't right. He shouldn't try and run 40, (even loaded long and to 40 pressure) in a 10.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests