I like 1911's

Discussion of handguns

Re: I like 1911's

Postby bstrawse on Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:50 pm

I use the slim grips on the Kimber SIS Pro I carry because I have smaller hands -- I also like the look better than the stock kimber grips. I have slim grips on my other Kimbers as well.

On the Springfield TRP and my Springfield Mil-Spec, I'm using the stock grips that came with both pistols. The TRP grips are pretty rough on the hands but not overwhelmingly so -- just a very aggressive bite..
b
Chair, Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus & Minnesota Gun Owners Political Action Committee - Join the Caucus TODAY
MN Permit to Carry Instructor| NRA Instructor | NRA Chief Range Safety Officer | Twitter | Facebook
User avatar
bstrawse
Moderator
 
Posts: 4224 [View]
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 11:45 am
Location: Roseville, MN

Re: I like 1911's

Postby m4andxdisbliss on Fri Dec 10, 2010 5:15 pm

bstrawse wrote:I use the slim grips on the Kimber SIS Pro I carry because I have smaller hands -- I also like the look better than the stock kimber grips. I have slim grips on my other Kimbers as well.

On the Springfield TRP and my Springfield Mil-Spec, I'm using the stock grips that came with both pistols. The TRP grips are pretty rough on the hands but not overwhelmingly so -- just a very aggressive bite..
b


If ya ever want to sell the TRP grips(Which I'm sure is doubtful), let me know. I'd be interested. Love that grey color.

I have U.S. grips from a GI on my Operator now, don't like em at all. Want the originals but previous owner sold em off.
User avatar
m4andxdisbliss
 
Posts: 248 [View]
Joined: Sat May 15, 2010 10:57 am
Location: Glencoe

Re: I like 1911's

Postby MNBlackjack on Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:00 pm

I ordered my third 1911. Should be in by mid-week. I decided not to go long slide.

http://www.para-usa.com/new/product_pistol.php?id=11
FFL
NRA - Lifetime Member
NSSF
The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.
- Ayn Rand
User avatar
MNBlackjack
 
Posts: 265 [View]
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 7:27 pm
Location: Lindstrom, MN

Re: I like 1911's

Postby Jeff Bergquist on Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:20 pm

MNBlackjack wrote:I ordered my third 1911. Should be in by mid-week. I decided not to go long slide.

http://www.para-usa.com/new/product_pistol.php?id=11


Sweet. I like my P14 .45 and P18 9mm a lot.
The bold type giveth, the fine print taketh away.
Jeff Bergquist
 
Posts: 915 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:00 pm

Re: I like 1911's

Postby scotts87iroc on Fri Dec 17, 2010 9:51 pm

A couple comments. To the original poster, not sure why anybody would think that 7 or 8 rounds should be plenty in a self defense situation. Are you aware that the police have a 13% success hit rate? That's only 1 in 8 shots actually "hit" the target! It's been proven that the average shooter is no better than the police because the average shooter practices at a range and doesn't have any experience moving around, or dealing with adrenaline.

And to the poster that commented on 1911's requiring "slingshotting" not being good, I would disagree. The 3" Kimber that I have states in the manual that you are required to slingshot the slide to chamber a round because of the size of the slide and the length of the spring. The force put on a slide when a round is fired is harsher than slingshotting the slide, so why would you want to "ride" the slide to chamber the first round? The all metal 1911s ain't gonna break by doing that!
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
User avatar
scotts87iroc
 
Posts: 40 [View]
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 7:36 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: I like 1911's

Postby rugersol on Fri Dec 17, 2010 10:32 pm

Image
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

Re: I like 1911's

Postby hammAR on Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:05 pm

scotts87iroc wrote:A couple comments. To the original poster, not sure why anybody would think that 7 or 8 rounds should be plenty in a self defense situation. Are you aware that the police have a 13% success hit rate? That's only 1 in 8 shots actually "hit" the target! It's been proven that the average shooter is no better than the police because the average shooter practices at a range and doesn't have any experience moving around, or dealing with adrenaline.


I have seen/heard a couple of things concerning the number of rounds fired. The first is something that was claimed to be reported by the FBI. According to this report the average incident was:

Avg distance: 7 ft
Shooters involved: 2
Avg Shots fired: 2
Avg Deaths: 1

While the above may be considered interesting, it may be more hear say than fact because it only included statistics where agents were killed.

In addition to the above, I have seen a write up by Massad Ayoob in one of the magazines where he brought up a revision to the NYPD Officer Involved Shooting Statistics. The revision came about after a review of all NYPD data, going back almost 100 yrs. The person conducting the review looked at the data differently than ever before. The big changes were, the elimination of Officer suicides and accidents, and the separation of shootings using revolvers from those using semi-autos. The results for average rounds fired changed as follows:

Average rounds fired from:
Revolvers: 5
Semi-Autos: 9

Statistics are cold comfort when you are the exception, statistics also lie.

The "average rounds fired in a gunfight" is in and of itself obfuscatory because their are, in fact 3 ways to determine an average.

The most common one, the arithmetic mean is determined by the sum of all of the list divided by the number of items in the list - 10 gunfights with rounds fired: 1, 5, 4, 8, 1, 2, 1, 18, 1, 2 has an arithmetic mean of 4.3 rounds fired.

HOWEVER...

The mode, the number which appears most frequently, is 1. This can be considered an average as well...

The median, well, that's not really relevant to this conversation, so I'm going to ignore that...

Bottom-line is that there appears to be a relationship between the amount of ammunition a weapon holds and a tendency to shoot more.

If you have enough rounds in your magazine to end the gunfight, then that is all you need.

Failing that if you have enough rounds in your magazine to get you through the initial exchange and still have some rounds left, you can then reload at your leisure. If you go to slide lock prior to the fight ending, then you'll have to reload and resume firing on an emergency basis.

Having enough rounds to get you through the fight without the necessity of a reload bringing about an inconvenient interruption would appear to provide a genuine advantage, but again, you only need enough rounds to end the fight......

Besides, if you are both out of ammo, the gunfight is over anyhow................
All men are created equal....It's what they do from there that matters!.
User avatar
hammAR
 
Posts: 11594 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Cultural Liaison....

Re: I like 1911's

Postby Jeff Bergquist on Sat Dec 18, 2010 1:44 am

IMO there is no magic formula that will guarantee your safety, you just make the choices/preparation that seem reasonable to you, and hope that you make the best choices if/when crunch time comes. I do think that almost any preparation is better than none.
The bold type giveth, the fine print taketh away.
Jeff Bergquist
 
Posts: 915 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:00 pm

Previous

Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

cron