EJSG19 wrote:hammAR wrote:EJSG19 wrote:I think if you are used to a 3'' group with whatever you shoot, you might be lucky if you can count on a 40'' group when it really counts and your body barely responds to your directions.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Bravo :bravo:](./images/smilies/extra/bravo_soldier.gif)
.............you are trainable............
![Cheers :cheers:](./images/smilies/extra/cheers.gif)
Lord knows I need it.
3'' under no stress and 40'' under stress would probably be a pretty good day for me.
There exists one of the major issues to gun owners. How can we reliably test our skills for such a situation should the need arise? You can simulate all you like, however, in the back of your head, you still know this is simulation only, and no one's shooting back at you or trying to take your family hostage etc. I suppose a scenario could be set up, and the gun carriers tested in a situation that seems real but isn't, something like this:
They are going to a cabin or a meeting and upon entrance, their guns have to be relinquished for a "safety check" (problem 1, most of us wouldn't do that easily, understandably so); then, at some point during the meeting or campout look a likes of their guns are returned, loaded with blanks instead of live ammo and laser recognition system (not visible, just indicates where rounds were fired); an assailant bursts in either firing or attempting to take family hostage etc. Immediately after, everyone's informed this was a test, and then the results are displayed to show how well you can do in what you thought was a real situation, not a simulated exercise. In the right setting, it would be informative, if not entertaining.