The 9 versus 40 or 45

Discussion of handguns

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby 1911fan on Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:13 am

Massive does not equal extreme power. The round is only loaded to about 14K PSI and that was intentional as on a very hot day in africa it might push 20k PSI as the powder was heat sensitive. It was far less powerful than Govt 45-70 loads and shot a smaller hard cast lead bullet. It penetrated like mad but powerwise it was far less than alot of modern rounds.
User avatar
1911fan
 
Posts: 6545 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Location: 35 W and Hwy 10

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby gyrfalcon on Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:25 am

1911fan wrote:Massive does not equal extreme power. The round is only loaded to about 14K PSI and that was intentional as on a very hot day in africa it might push 20k PSI as the powder was heat sensitive. It was far less powerful than Govt 45-70 loads and shot a smaller hard cast lead bullet. It penetrated like mad but powerwise it was far less than alot of modern rounds.


??? Yeah I understand it's not .50BMG or as powerful as modern .45-70 loads, but it's still a pretty massive and deadly round:

.577/450 Martini-Henry
400 gr (26 g) lead 1,450 ft/s (440 m/s) 1,868 ft·lbf (2,533 J)
480 gr (31 g) lead 1,350 ft/s (410 m/s) 1,943 ft·lbf (2,634 J)

.45-70 (Trapdoor):
300 (Trapdoor) Lead PB 1,597 ft/s (487 m/s) 1,699 ft·lbf (2,304 J)
405 (Trapdoor) Lead FN 1,394 ft/s (425 m/s) 1,748 ft·lbf (2,370 J)

.30-06:
150 gr (9.7 g) Nosler Ballistic Tip 2,910 ft/s (890 m/s) 2,820 ft·lbf (3,820 J)
165 gr (10.7 g) BTSP 2,800 ft/s (850 m/s) 2,872 ft·lbf (3,894 J)

.223:
55 gr (3.6 g) Nosler ballistic tip 3,240 ft/s (990 m/s) 1,282 ft·lbf (1,738 J)
60 gr (3.9 g) Nosler partition 3,160 ft/s (960 m/s) 1,330 ft·lbf (1,800 J)
69 gr (4.5 g) BTHP 2,950 ft/s (900 m/s) 1,333 ft·lbf
"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without." -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
gyrfalcon
 
Posts: 3467 [View]
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 1:34 pm

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby Holland&Holland on Tue Jan 11, 2011 11:53 am

Anyone make an IWB holster for a Martini Henry? PM me I need to borrow one for my trip into Zulu land.
User avatar
Holland&Holland
 
Posts: 12661 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:17 am

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby gyrfalcon on Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:03 pm

Holland&Holland wrote:Anyone make an IWB holster for a Martini Henry? PM me I need to borrow one for my trip into Zulu land.


Shhh.. you might give someone an idea! :lol:

Image
"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without." -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
gyrfalcon
 
Posts: 3467 [View]
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 1:34 pm

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby mnglocker on Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:15 pm

gyrfalcon wrote:
1911fan wrote:Massive does not equal extreme power. The round is only loaded to about 14K PSI and that was intentional as on a very hot day in africa it might push 20k PSI as the powder was heat sensitive. It was far less powerful than Govt 45-70 loads and shot a smaller hard cast lead bullet. It penetrated like mad but powerwise it was far less than alot of modern rounds.


??? Yeah I understand it's not .50BMG or as powerful as modern .45-70 loads, but it's still a pretty massive and deadly round:

.577/450 Martini-Henry
400 gr (26 g) lead 1,450 ft/s (440 m/s) 1,868 ft·lbf (2,533 J)
480 gr (31 g) lead 1,350 ft/s (410 m/s) 1,943 ft·lbf (2,634 J)

.45-70 (Trapdoor):
300 (Trapdoor) Lead PB 1,597 ft/s (487 m/s) 1,699 ft·lbf (2,304 J)
405 (Trapdoor) Lead FN 1,394 ft/s (425 m/s) 1,748 ft·lbf (2,370 J)

.30-06:
150 gr (9.7 g) Nosler Ballistic Tip 2,910 ft/s (890 m/s) 2,820 ft·lbf (3,820 J)
165 gr (10.7 g) BTSP 2,800 ft/s (850 m/s) 2,872 ft·lbf (3,894 J)

.223:
55 gr (3.6 g) Nosler ballistic tip 3,240 ft/s (990 m/s) 1,282 ft·lbf (1,738 J)
60 gr (3.9 g) Nosler partition 3,160 ft/s (960 m/s) 1,330 ft·lbf (1,800 J)
69 gr (4.5 g) BTHP 2,950 ft/s (900 m/s) 1,333 ft·lbf


Ft.lbs don't mean sheet. Taylor KO is what counts.
-Get a rope Tuco.
What happens in the basement stays in the basement.


http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
mnglocker
 
Posts: 4722 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 12:25 am

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby Pinnacle on Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:31 pm

None of this means anything unless you can actually - HIT THE TARGET.

Misses dont count, TKO does not count, Ft/Lbs. do not count, nothing matters more than hitting the target. If you are looking for a one shot solution, there isn't one.

Most people cant shoot all that well, and shooting a hard recoiling pistol for self defense - doesn't help.
REMEMBER THE BRAVE 343 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET FDNY

الصليبية كافر
Pinnacle
 
Posts: 2945 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: East of the Mississippi WAAAAAYYYY East

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby Dave Pendleton on Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:44 pm

Pinnacle wrote:Most people cant shoot all that well, and shooting a hard recoiling pistol for self defense - doesn't help.


Which is why I switched.
Dave Pendleton
 
Posts: 1157 [View]
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:22 pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby hammAR on Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:52 pm

.45 all the way.............
and if it hurts you to shoot it, just imagine how the perp you hit feels.................... :rotf:
All men are created equal....It's what they do from there that matters!.
User avatar
hammAR
 
Posts: 11594 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Cultural Liaison....

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby Dave Pendleton on Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:19 pm

It doesn't hurt, I just don't shoot it all that well.
Dave Pendleton
 
Posts: 1157 [View]
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:22 pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby hammAR on Tue Jan 11, 2011 10:31 pm

Practice, and get with someone that does and have them work with you...........then practice more until you master it..... ;)
All men are created equal....It's what they do from there that matters!.
User avatar
hammAR
 
Posts: 11594 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Cultural Liaison....

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby tazdevil on Wed Jan 12, 2011 12:18 am

Next thing you know, you guys are going to argue that one type of round is faster than the other, so if someone has that round, their bullet can reach the other shooter faster than the other bullet can reach................................ :blah:
1911 Fan quote in memoirium about carrying:
The purpose of a firearm in a defensive situation is to make the other guy leak from holes he was not born with. Your job is to install those orifices for him.
User avatar
tazdevil
 
Posts: 905 [View]
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:52 pm
Location: over your shoulder, whispering sweet nothings in your ear.

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby Heffay on Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:01 am

tazdevil wrote:Next thing you know, you guys are going to argue that one type of round is faster than the other, so if someone has that round, their bullet can reach the other shooter faster than the other bullet can reach................................ :blah:


Pfft, that problem is easy to solve. You just shoot their bullets out of the air as they come towards you. The 9mm wins again, since you'll end up with more bullets than they have!
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby hammAR on Wed Jan 12, 2011 1:09 pm

Heffay wrote:
tazdevil wrote:Next thing you know, you guys are going to argue that one type of round is faster than the other, so if someone has that round, their bullet can reach the other shooter faster than the other bullet can reach................................ :blah:


Pfft, that problem is easy to solve. You just shoot their bullets out of the air as they come towards you. The 9mm wins again, since you'll end up with more bullets than they have!


This sounds like a box o'truth challenge..................... :P
All men are created equal....It's what they do from there that matters!.
User avatar
hammAR
 
Posts: 11594 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Cultural Liaison....

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby Pinnacle on Thu Jan 13, 2011 8:36 am

Looking at this debate objectively, the ancient caliber debate, there is a lot of merit to the discussion, but not a lot of real value.

Does a 45 give you a relative advantage in a gunfight? Only if you can shoot it as well as you can any other caliber. Does a 9mm place you at a disadvantage? Only if you cant shoot it well.

Objectively, I think that this debate can be settled by making the statement "You have to be able to hit your target."

Is any gun better than any other? I dont really think so

Rules for Handguns:
1. a handgun has to be reliable and in good repair.
2. YOU HAVE TO KNOW HOW TO OPERATE IT
3. You must know the basics of pistol marksmanship
4. you must be able to handle the gun safely.
Last edited by Pinnacle on Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
REMEMBER THE BRAVE 343 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET FDNY

الصليبية كافر
Pinnacle
 
Posts: 2945 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: East of the Mississippi WAAAAAYYYY East

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby macphisto on Thu Jan 13, 2011 9:34 am

I shoot a .45 VERY WELL and can control the hell out of a 1911.

YUO = JELLUS! :P
User avatar
macphisto
 
Posts: 5184 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:04 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron