The 9 versus 40 or 45

Discussion of handguns
Write comments

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby Pinnacle on Mon Jan 17, 2011 3:23 pm

Jealous? Moi

No, realistic? Yes

I just so happen to shoot the 9mm well enough to trust it implicitly. I can make holes where they need to go and fast... Many Many holes.....
REMEMBER THE BRAVE 343 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET FDNY

الصليبية كافر
Pinnacle
 
Posts: 2945 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: East of the Mississippi WAAAAAYYYY East
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby gyrfalcon on Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:42 pm

9mm fricken rocks, I can turn on the sprinkler and shoot all the water droplets out of the air before they hit the ground... and I'll still have ammo left in my mag. :twisted:
"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without." -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
gyrfalcon
 
Posts: 3467 [View]
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 1:34 pm
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby westberg on Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:13 pm

gyrfalcon wrote:9mm fricken rocks, I can turn on the sprinkler and shoot all the water droplets out of the air before they hit the ground... and I'll still have ammo left in my mag. :twisted:

:rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
User avatar
westberg
 
Posts: 4830 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:42 pm
Location: Wyoming, MN
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby westhope on Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:14 pm

gyrfalcon wrote:9mm fricken rocks, I can turn on the sprinkler and shoot all the water droplets out of the air before they hit the ground... and I'll still have ammo left in my mag. :twisted:



I pull out my 45, the water freezes from FEAR! No shots fired, still have a full mag!
Because I care, I carry.
HOPE for the best in people, but PLAN for the worst.
User avatar
westhope
 
Posts: 1721 [View]
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 8:55 am
Location: West of Hope, MN. (South Central MN)
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby hammAR on Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:28 pm

westhope wrote:
gyrfalcon wrote:9mm fricken rocks, I can turn on the sprinkler and shoot all the water droplets out of the air before they hit the ground... and I'll still have ammo left in my mag. :twisted:



I pull out my 45, the water freezes from FEAR! No shots fired, still have a full mag!


Thanks, but they will still not understand that there is no spoon.............little bullets, little brains....... :P
All men are created equal....It's what they do from there that matters!.
User avatar
hammAR
 
Posts: 11594 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Cultural Liaison....
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby tazdevil on Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:07 am

ok, now this is just getting sad.

:lalala: I'm not listening to anyone anymore, but they keep talking.

So the debate basically follows this line of reasoning: :catfight:
1911 Fan quote in memoirium about carrying:
The purpose of a firearm in a defensive situation is to make the other guy leak from holes he was not born with. Your job is to install those orifices for him.
User avatar
tazdevil
 
Posts: 905 [View]
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:52 pm
Location: over your shoulder, whispering sweet nothings in your ear.
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby Heffay on Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:30 am

If only they made a .45 that was the size of a 9mm. That way you could solve the power AND capacity issue all at once!
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby Dave Pendleton on Tue Jan 18, 2011 10:58 am

Heffay wrote:If only they made a .45 that was the size of a 9mm. That way you could solve the power AND capacity issue all at once!


Nice troll.

7/10
Dave Pendleton
 
Posts: 1157 [View]
Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:22 pm
Location: St. Paul, MN
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby gyrfalcon on Tue Jan 18, 2011 11:03 am

Heffay wrote:If only they made a .45 that was the size of a 9mm. That way you could solve the power AND capacity issue all at once!


Or if they made a .45 that shot a .40 that shot a 9mm... :D
Image
"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without." -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
gyrfalcon
 
Posts: 3467 [View]
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 1:34 pm
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby plblark on Tue Jan 18, 2011 11:06 am

didn't they make that rail mount that held a pistol under a carbine handguard?

I'm thinking stacked setup. 45 with 40 in mount on its rail with 9 in mount on its rail ... Now to figure out the simultaneous trigger issue :-)
private or small grou permit classes available
"I'll take a huge order of fiscal responsibility, a side of small government, hold the religion please. " Paraphrase from Tamara K
RIP 1911Fan
User avatar
plblark
 
Posts: 6794 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 12:12 pm
Location: Roseville
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby westhope on Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:00 pm

Heffay wrote:If only they made a .45 that was the size of a 9mm. That way you could solve the power AND capacity issue all at once!


Para Warthog comes close: 10+1 of 45 ACP

http://www.para-usa.com/new/product_pistol.php?id=8
Because I care, I carry.
HOPE for the best in people, but PLAN for the worst.
User avatar
westhope
 
Posts: 1721 [View]
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 8:55 am
Location: West of Hope, MN. (South Central MN)
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby hammAR on Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:28 pm

What is with all you folks about this capacity crap.........
if you get down on a 1911 (8+1), then what do you feel about wheel gun carriers (5+0 or 6+0)..... :shock:
All men are created equal....It's what they do from there that matters!.
User avatar
hammAR
 
Posts: 11594 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Cultural Liaison....
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby gyrfalcon on Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:37 pm

hammAR wrote:...if you get down on a 1911 (8+1), then what do you feel about wheel gun carriers (5+0 or 6+0)..... :shock:


Isn't that why the cowboys carried two or more wheels guns on their hips? :D :lol:
"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without." -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
gyrfalcon
 
Posts: 3467 [View]
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 1:34 pm
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby westhope on Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:55 pm

hammAR wrote:What is with all you folks about this capacity crap.........
if you get down on a 1911 (8+1), then what do you feel about wheel gun carriers (5+0 or 6+0)..... :shock:



45 ACP revolvers are fine. Others? Don't Ask, Don't Tell.
Because I care, I carry.
HOPE for the best in people, but PLAN for the worst.
User avatar
westhope
 
Posts: 1721 [View]
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 8:55 am
Location: West of Hope, MN. (South Central MN)
Top

Re: The 9 versus 40 or 45

Postby Heffay on Tue Jan 18, 2011 7:35 pm

Size queens make me laugh.
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am
Top
PreviousNext
Write comments

Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron