agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Discussion of handguns

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby rugersol on Mon Feb 07, 2011 10:36 am

issued to agents in the fall of 2009 ... manufacturer's warranty expiring at the end of 2010


I'm not gonna say Kimber's incapable of making a good gun ... I've owned a few ... most had one problem or 'nother ... I've had trouble with Colt's, too.

DIFFERENCE is, when I sent a Colt in, that a "gunsmith" clearly F'd with, I got it back with a long list of what they did, and "NO CHARGE" at the bottom.

When I sent a BRAND NEW $1,000 Kimber in (that was several years ago), I had to pay ANOTHER $150 to Kimber to get it to work right ... and fact is, it STILL didn't!

My personal experience aside, that's a 1yr "warranty" (http://www.kimberamerica.com/warranty). You send a Ruger, S&W (http://www.smith-wesson.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Category1_750001_750051_757818_-1_757814_757812), or Colt back, anytime you like, and unless you cut it in half with a hacksaw, they'll fix it ... for free!
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby Heffay on Mon Feb 07, 2011 12:17 pm

MNBlackjack wrote:I'll put my 3" Kimber against any other carry pistol out there in .45 and see whose fails first. I have not had one problem with mine...ever. And I bought it used for $700.00


Anecdotes ain't evidence.
To the two forum members who have used lines from my posts as their signatures, can't you quote Jesse Ventura or some other great Minnesotan instead of stealing mine? - LePetomane
User avatar
Heffay
 
Posts: 8842 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:39 am

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby Erik_Pakieser on Mon Feb 07, 2011 3:25 pm

Anecdotally, in the classes I have been teaching, it seems that the compact M1911s have a high malfunction rate compared to other guns, with Springfield and Kimber being the most problematic. I have not kept track of specific numbers.

Full and "Commander" size M1911s seem to work just fine.
Fight-focused defensive handgun, rifle, and shotgun training
http://www.qsitraining.net
http://www.facebook.com/qsifirearms
User avatar
Erik_Pakieser
 
Posts: 732 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:49 am
Location: Saint Anthony, Minnesota

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby mmcnx2 on Mon Feb 07, 2011 3:30 pm

In terms of Compact 1911's I never had any trouble with my para or springfield. My wifes EMP has run 100% out of the box and eats anything I've feed it.

I think this is just another example of the typical Kimber issues.
User avatar
mmcnx2
 
Posts: 2208 [View]
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Hanover, MN

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby scotts87iroc on Mon Feb 07, 2011 6:55 pm

hammAR wrote:
Anyone that buys a 3" 1911 in .45 is foolish, especially if they are going to use it for covering their own ass.................... :?


Not very opinionated are we?

I carry a 3" 1911 in .45 of the Kimber persuasion and I use it for covering my ***. I haven't had any issues with it either. It shoots whatever I put through it. Maybe the foolish person is the one that makes these comments and doesn't know how to shoot the gun!

I hope my comments don't offend, but I'm offended being called foolish when I don't think anybody on this board knows me personally.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
User avatar
scotts87iroc
 
Posts: 40 [View]
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 7:36 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby Seismic Sam on Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:02 pm

scotts87iroc wrote:
hammAR wrote:
Anyone that buys a 3" 1911 in .45 is foolish, especially if they are going to use it for covering their own ass.................... :?


Not very opinionated are we?

I carry a 3" 1911 in .45 of the Kimber persuasion and I use it for covering my ***. I haven't had any issues with it either. It shoots whatever I put through it. Maybe the foolish person is the one that makes these comments and doesn't know how to shoot the gun!

I hope my comments don't offend, but I'm offended being called foolish when I don't think anybody on this board knows me personally.


In the words of Don Henley, GET OVER IT!! Pretty much everyone on this board knows me, and I'm generally called an idiot, wiseazz, loudmouth, and reloading troll under the bridge. Count your blessings while we still don't know who you really are!!
User avatar
Seismic Sam
Gone but not forgotten
 
Posts: 5515 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:02 pm
Location: Pass By-You, Loosianana

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby mmcnx2 on Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:39 pm

Seismic Sam wrote:.... I'm generally called a .... reloading troll under the bridge...


You say that like it is bad thing. I thought that was your good if not best trait. :D
User avatar
mmcnx2
 
Posts: 2208 [View]
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Hanover, MN

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby hammAR on Mon Feb 07, 2011 9:19 pm

scotts87iroc wrote:
hammAR wrote:
Anyone that buys a 3" 1911 in .45 is foolish, especially if they are going to use it for covering their own ass.................... :?


Not very opinionated are we?

I carry a 3" 1911 in .45 of the Kimber persuasion and I use it for covering my ***. I haven't had any issues with it either. It shoots whatever I put through it. Maybe the foolish person is the one that makes these comments and doesn't know how to shoot the gun!

I hope my comments don't offend, but I'm offended being called foolish when I don't think anybody on this board knows me personally.


Yes, I am very opinionated, I am surely not offended, and you just helped form yet another opinion..................
and I sure as hell was not aiming my post at you, because you are correct that I do not know you, but hey you are the one that volunteered to stand up and pretend that you were the target........
All men are created equal....It's what they do from there that matters!.
User avatar
hammAR
 
Posts: 11594 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Cultural Liaison....

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby 2beer on Mon Feb 07, 2011 9:58 pm

scotts87iroc wrote:
hammAR wrote:
Anyone that buys a 3" 1911 in .45 is foolish, especially if they are going to use it for covering their own ass.................... :?


Not very opinionated are we?

I carry a 3" 1911 in .45 of the Kimber persuasion and I use it for covering my ***. I haven't had any issues with it either. It shoots whatever I put through it. Maybe the foolish person is the one that makes these comments and doesn't know how to shoot the gun!

I hope my comments don't offend, but I'm offended being called foolish when I don't think anybody on this board knows me personally.




Image
2beer
 
Posts: 157 [View]
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 1:23 pm

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby diskdoctr on Mon Feb 07, 2011 10:03 pm

I carry a Citadel 1911 in 3.5" .45. Totally trust it. Have a Kimber and a Colt that cannot be trusted. They are pretty and I will take them to the range from time to time for failure practice if I feel the need. Otherwise they are safe queens, and not worth their weight in steel. Both have been back in for service, the Kimber 3 times. CS in both cases say the firearm is fine. Anyway, the Citadels are a trustworthy option and cheaper than the PT1911.
User avatar
diskdoctr
 
Posts: 846 [View]
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:51 pm
Location: Northwest Suburbs

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby Rem700 on Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:05 pm

I have a couple of pre series II Kimbers in both 4" and 5" I regularly carry the Kimber Pro CDP.

I HAD a series II Kimber 3" CDP, I really liked the compactness light weight and accuracy. Most undependable POS I ever owned the two happiest days was the day I got it and the day I got rid of it.
“The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers.”
Thomas Jefferson

If your not behind our troops please stand infront of them.
User avatar
Rem700
 
Posts: 2359 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:29 pm
Location: Blaine

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby scotts87iroc on Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:40 pm

Not sure why Seismic Sam got all bent out of shape with my comments!!!

HammAR, I understand you have a lot of experience with guns and using them, but to say that people are foolish for using a 3" 1911 begs the question, why? Not all of them are unreliable. And it's not only the Kimber 1911 that experience problems. It was mentioned on this thread already that other makes have experienced issues also. It's not only the 3", but I have heard of plenty of guns in all lengths that have an issue of some sort. My comment was regarding the name calling and how it's not necessary.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
User avatar
scotts87iroc
 
Posts: 40 [View]
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 7:36 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby mmcnx2 on Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:09 pm

I think the point a few of us expereinced 1911 guys are making is...

KImber = unreliable
3" 1911 = can be unreliable
Kimber + 3" 1911 = what the heck are you thinking
User avatar
mmcnx2
 
Posts: 2208 [View]
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Hanover, MN

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby timwarner on Tue Feb 08, 2011 6:42 pm

mmcnx2 wrote:I think the point a few of us expereinced 1911 guys are making is...

KImber = unreliable
3" 1911 = can be unreliable
Kimber + 3" 1911 = what the heck are you thinking


+1

Both the kimber's I've owned have been nice, worked great, etc.
But, based off of what I've heard, plus adding what I've heard about 3" 1911 problems...

I would avoid a 3", and especially a 3" kimber.
Tim
USPSA club MN07
http://ipsc.krok.us
timwarner
 
Posts: 1939 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 3:46 pm

Re: agents choose to carry personal weapons instead of Kimber

Postby tman on Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:08 pm

Mrs tman065 just bought a 3" Kimber. She's put a litle over 100 rounds downrange so far. There were two consecutive mags that had some FTRTB's. Added some lube to the rails, and she was back off to the races.
Badged Thug & MN Permit to Carry Instructor
Slowly growing 1911 Glock collection. Donations accepted
User avatar
tman
 
Posts: 2981 [View]
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: Centrally isolated in Northern MN

PreviousNext

Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron