357 Sig

Discussion of handguns

Re: 357 Sig

Postby 1911fan on Mon Oct 15, 2007 10:23 pm

The 357 sig really shines in the MP5 platform. 1450 fps with the 148 jhp or 1800 with the 115's,
User avatar
1911fan
 
Posts: 6545 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 1:56 pm
Location: 35 W and Hwy 10

Re: 357 Sig

Postby Pezhead on Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:00 am

If I recall (and that's difficult sometimes) I think Masad Ayoob carries one occaisonaly. Just can't remember where I read it. It does show potential as a self defense load.
User avatar
Pezhead
 
Posts: 4714 [View]
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 6:20 am
Location: Shakopee

Re: 357 Sig

Postby DeanC on Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:20 am

Yes, Ayoob has one. The Air Marshalls also carry 357 sig.

A carbine 357 sig would be able to make those puppies scream.

DeanC wrote:http://washingtontimes.com/national/20060613-123248-2105r.htm

Air marshals: Bullets pack too much punch

By Audrey Hudson
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
June 13, 2006

Federal air marshals say their guns are loaded with bullets capable of running through more than one person, metal doors and thick glass -- too much firepower for an airplane.
"Not only is the person getting shot in danger, but everyone on the plane is because of the distance it travels," said one air marshal who testified in a recently completed House Judiciary Committee investigation of policies marshals deemed dangerous.
Several marshals say their bullets can penetrate most of the material in planes, leaving pilots and the plane's hydraulics and flight-control system vulnerable if a weapon is discharged. Cockpit doors have been hardened with steel, but the walls on either side of the door have not.
Another marshal told the House committee agents should be issued ammunition loaded with frangible bullets, which break into smaller pieces on impact and thus have limited power to exit the target and continue.
"An aircraft is made up of composites, plastics, and aluminum. If a round were to penetrate through the front plastic/composite windshield of the aircraft, the results would be catastrophic at 500 miles per hour. We should be using frangible ammunition. It's a no-brainer," the Nov. 27 memo said.
The House Judiciary report, released last week, included the committee's concerns about the ammunition, but the Transportation Security Administration's response was redacted from the report.
Federal Air Marshal Service Director Dana Brown is reviewing the agency's use of a .357-caliber handgun and Speer Gold Dot .357 SIG round, nonfrangible ammunition, said FAMS spokesman Conan Bruce.
Mr. Bruce said air marshals used to use frangible ammunition but switched weapons and ammunition after researching testing by outside groups. The change was approved by former FAMS Director Thomas Quinn, a former Secret Service agent.
Massad Ayoob, a ballistics authority and director of the Lethal Force Institute, calls the ammunition "an excellent load" that the Secret Service uses to protect the president. The bullet is designed to expand in the body to cause greater physical harm.
"If you get a peripheral hit in the arm, it has enough power to keep going and kill whoever it hits," said Mr. Ayoob, who explained that the bullet moves 1,350 feet per second.
"It's no trick to change the ammunition load they are using now to 1,500 feet per second to get a 10-inch, very substantial wound, and it would minimize the likelihood of an exit," Mr. Ayoob said. "That would reduce penetration by a few inches and widen the wound, which brings about a faster cessation of the action."
Federal air marshals have tough shooting requirements and "are among the best shooters in law enforcement," Mr. Ayoob says.
Don Strange, former special agent in charge of the FAMS Atlanta field office, said the ammunition FAMS agents use is good for the Secret Service and other law enforcement but not in the "tube of an airplane."
"It would penetrate at least the first body, but it can also penetrate a second and possibly third body," Mr. Strange said.
Mr. Strange has more than 30 years of federal law-enforcement experience but says he was fired from FAMS by Mr. Quinn for criticizing the agency's choice of ammunition, dress code and other policies.
When Mr. Strange informed officials at FAMS headquarters of his concern about the weapon's load, "I told them I hoped the reason we were using it was not because Quinn wants us to, and they said that is the reason."
Philip Van Cleave, a former deputy sheriff and president of the Virginia Citizens Defense League, said he was surprised to learn the marshals are not using frangible firepower.
"It's ironic that the very people who are carrying the guns are complaining, that tells you something there -- they don't want to be underarmed, but they want to be able to protect passengers," Mr. Van Cleave said.
Several thousand pilots are trained to carry guns to protect the cockpit, however David Mackett, president of the Airline Pilots Security Alliance, declined to say what kind of weapons or ammunition are used by federal flight-deck officers.
"The federal air marshals are competent and experienced law enforcement, and I would take any recommendations they would make very seriously," Mr. Mackett said.
The House investigation said in its report released last week that policies dictating dress and boarding procedures in sight of passengers undermine the marshals' anonymity and suggested that any marshal who initiated changes fell victim to retaliation.
In its response to the committee, the Transportation Security Administration, which manages FAMS, said the policies have been changed. Air marshals who spoke to panel lawyers disagreed with the TSA's claims in interviews with The Washington Times.
Decrypt the points of departure and return your head slowly and you do not cancel your hair.
User avatar
DeanC
 
Posts: 8502 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:22 am
Location: Captain Cufflinks

Re: 357 Sig

Postby Seismic Sam on Thu Oct 18, 2007 10:51 am

1911fan wrote:The 357 sig really shines in the MP5 platform. 1450 fps with the 148 jhp or 1800 with the 115's,


Alright!! What's the load to get a 115 grain go 1800 with the 357 Sig?? Sierra Manual #5 places the top end of the velocity for 115 gr. bullets at 1450. The manual also has a maximum velocity of 1450 for 38 Super with 115 grain bullets.

What's the TRUE frequency, Kenneth??
User avatar
Seismic Sam
Gone but not forgotten
 
Posts: 5515 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:02 pm
Location: Pass By-You, Loosianana

Re: 357 Sig

Postby DeanC on Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:06 pm

Seismic Sam wrote:Alright!! What's the load to get a 115 grain go 1800 with the 357 Sig??

I imagine you have to start with a 16" barrel.
Decrypt the points of departure and return your head slowly and you do not cancel your hair.
User avatar
DeanC
 
Posts: 8502 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 8:22 am
Location: Captain Cufflinks

Re: 357 Sig

Postby hammAR on Thu Oct 18, 2007 4:25 pm

DeanC wrote:
Seismic Sam wrote:Alright!! What's the load to get a 115 grain go 1800 with the 357 Sig??

I imagine you have to start with a 16" barrel.


Standard MP-5 barrel is 8.8583 in and I didn't know they made one in 357 Sig.

ETA: The UMP-45 and the 10mm MP5 are used by the FBI.
All men are created equal....It's what they do from there that matters!.
User avatar
hammAR
 
Posts: 11594 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:31 pm
Location: Cultural Liaison....

Re: 357 Sig

Postby High_Cap on Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:01 pm

Don't load past limits on 357 sig. Or at least don't go to the max, for some time.

I had a bullet come apart plating, and lead. It was very hot a touch over 1500fps in a 125 gr bullet. ( according to load data)

Still being said it is a pain in the butt to load and get them to work in an auto due to the fact they headspace at the neck and at the rim.
High_Cap
 
Posts: 202 [View]
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 2:44 pm

Re: 357 Sig

Postby knievel on Sat Jan 26, 2008 12:58 pm

I was loading 357SIG right up by the max and had brass failures right at the bottleneck of the spent brass.
knievel
 
Posts: 7 [View]
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:51 pm

Re: 357 Sig

Postby Pinnacle on Sat Jan 26, 2008 1:13 pm

I would swap that 357 SIG BBl out for a 40 if it were me. 357 Sig is a PITA
REMEMBER THE BRAVE 343 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET FDNY

الصليبية كافر
Pinnacle
 
Posts: 2945 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: East of the Mississippi WAAAAAYYYY East

Re: 357 Sig

Postby Brian@ITC on Wed Mar 05, 2008 6:42 pm

I've had a SIG P229 chambered in .357 Sig, as well as a Glock 32. Here is my opinion. You can reload them as I did when I owned that caliber. However, you have to be sure that you do things right because the bullets have a tendency to recess in the casing if you don't crimp it just right.

Quite honestly, I think that you can get close to the velocity of the .357 Sig by using +P ammunition in a 9mm. And, your practice session will be a lot less expensive when shooting 9mm. If you can shoot the .357 Sig with one hand and hit what you are aiming at, then go for it I guess. I just didn't see any reason to spend the extra money for the results I can get with the +P ammo.

Train hard, train often, and train REALISTICALLY!!!
_______________
Brian K. LaMaster
President-Innovative Tactical Concepts, LLC
Instructor-Counter Force
Modern Warrior Talk
"High Impact Training"
“Serious tactics for serious situations!”
Check our Advanced Pistol Fighting Course out in the April 2008 issue of SWAT Magazine!
User avatar
Brian@ITC
 
Posts: 25 [View]
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:55 pm

Previous

Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron