Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Discussion of handguns

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby Paul on Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:39 am

Erik_Pakieser wrote:One concern I have about the 34 is the adjustable rear sights. On a defensive pistol I prefer the more durable fixed sights.

Either one would be getting Trijicon night sights.
Paul
Moderator
 
Posts: 5879 [View]
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2009 6:46 am

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby RobD on Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:39 am

Erik_Pakieser wrote:One concern I have about the 34 is the adjustable rear sights. On a defensive pistol I prefer the more durable fixed sights.


My 34 came with fixed sites... (the rear site fell out at the Farnam class though... not quite designed for slide racking...)
RobD
 
Posts: 2846 [View]
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:22 pm

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby Hammer99... on Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:40 am

Erik_Pakieser wrote:One concern I have about the 34 is the adjustable rear sights. On a defensive pistol I prefer the more durable fixed sights.

Other than that, I see no reason not to carry a G34 over the G17, particularly if concealment is not an issue. Even then, with an IWB holster and/or proper outer garments, the extra barrel length shouldn't be a problem.


I'm a total Glock fanboy but lets face it. Standard Glock sights in any flavor are crap. And to tell you the truth I like the fact that I can just throw them out. That way I can install sights of my choice....
I love it when a plan comes together!
User avatar
Hammer99...
 
Posts: 916 [View]
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:20 pm
Location: Columbia Heights

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby MissouriDave on Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:01 pm

Trijicon HD sights are great. Stock Glock plastic sights are not for sure.

With the 34, the barrel length will be the same approx. as the end of the light. So there is no increased length to pull the firearm out of the holster. The extra barrel length will yield higher velocities. With those higher velocities comes greater bullet expansion, usually considered a good thing.

A reference for some testing: http://www.firearmstactical.com/ammo_data/9mm.htm.

Why not gain the extra velocity and sight radius? The 34 is as easy to carry as the 17. The light will need less cleaning, and will experience less stress due to being under the barrel instead of sticking out and receiving a direct hit from the shock wave of the superheated gasses hitting the cooler air. It might save a few bulbs.?
User avatar
MissouriDave
 
Posts: 277 [View]
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:17 pm
Location: Springfield Missouri.

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby dleong on Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:34 pm

I opted for the Hi-Viz front sight and LPA target adjustable rear sight on my G34:

Image
Image
Image

The stock plastic adjustable rear sight was unusable for target work as the adjustments were excessively coarse (one click of elevation adjustment would move the POI at 25 yards about 2") and its discontinuous top edge proved a visual distraction that hindered target acquisition. When replacing the rear sight, the factory sight could be removed with just finger pressure!

The current sight set-up, together with some trigger tweaks (2 lb. break with zero overtravel), has helped me realize this firearm's true accuracy potential (sub-2" groups at 25 yards with my subsonic handloads).
User avatar
dleong
 
Posts: 742 [View]
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 8:38 pm
Location: Gravel Valley

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby timwarner on Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:39 pm

mnglocker wrote:Farmer, a 34C is ported. As Paul said:

Paul wrote:The top of the slide is cut out to drive weight and achieve better balance, but the barrel is not ported.


It's cut out to make the slide weigh the same as the slide on a 17, so that the same recoil spring may be used.


Where can I get a 34C?
Tim
USPSA club MN07
http://ipsc.krok.us
timwarner
 
Posts: 1939 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 3:46 pm

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby MissouriDave on Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:03 pm

Lone Wolf has the 34C.

Image
User avatar
MissouriDave
 
Posts: 277 [View]
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:17 pm
Location: Springfield Missouri.

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby timwarner on Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:05 pm

replacement barrel does not a 34C make.
Tim
USPSA club MN07
http://ipsc.krok.us
timwarner
 
Posts: 1939 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 3:46 pm

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby MissouriDave on Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:06 pm

MyBad.

Edit:

Forgot that the 34 shot so good Glock decided they didn't need a "C" version.
User avatar
MissouriDave
 
Posts: 277 [View]
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:17 pm
Location: Springfield Missouri.

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby rtk on Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:46 pm

I had a 34 and sold it. I prefer the 17 as I can get it out of the the holster a bit quicker.

YMMV.
The sky is falling, the sky is falling....(Chicken Little)
User avatar
rtk
 
Posts: 3097 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:34 pm

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby MissouriDave on Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:09 pm

I don't think I'm buying in on getting a 34 with a light out of the holster faster than a 17 with a light. Maybe I am wrong.
User avatar
MissouriDave
 
Posts: 277 [View]
Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2010 12:17 pm
Location: Springfield Missouri.

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby rtk on Wed Aug 24, 2011 5:21 pm

MissouriDave wrote:I don't think I'm buying in on getting a 34 with a light out of the holster faster than a 17 with a light. Maybe I am wrong.



I bought the 34 for IDPA (no light) and found that I could do just as well or better with the 17 (no light). I try to shoot what I carry....17 (no light) or 19 (no light), I won't go anything smaller in frame size. ;)
The sky is falling, the sky is falling....(Chicken Little)
User avatar
rtk
 
Posts: 3097 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:34 pm

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby Pinnacle on Thu Aug 25, 2011 4:55 am

timwarner wrote:replacement barrel does not a 34C make.


Ummm yeah it does.
REMEMBER THE BRAVE 343 - WE WILL NEVER FORGET FDNY

الصليبية كافر
Pinnacle
 
Posts: 2945 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:57 pm
Location: East of the Mississippi WAAAAAYYYY East

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby Erik_Pakieser on Thu Aug 25, 2011 11:08 am

RobD wrote:
Erik_Pakieser wrote:One concern I have about the 34 is the adjustable rear sights. On a defensive pistol I prefer the more durable fixed sights.


My 34 came with fixed sites... (the rear site fell out at the Farnam class though... not quite designed for slide racking...)


Thanks for point that out, I've only seen them with adjustable sights, and assumed they came that way.
Fight-focused defensive handgun, rifle, and shotgun training
http://www.qsitraining.net
http://www.facebook.com/qsifirearms
User avatar
Erik_Pakieser
 
Posts: 732 [View]
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 8:49 am
Location: Saint Anthony, Minnesota

Re: Glock 34 -- Somebody Convince Me

Postby Consummate on Thu Aug 25, 2011 12:03 pm

I definitely like my 34 more than my 17, or 19.

07 FFL SOT
Also providing Cerakote Firearm finishes
Born to fight, trained to kill, ready to die, but never will.
http://www.SchreyerWeaponSystems.com

LIKE us! http://www.Facebook.com/SchreyerWeaponSystems
User avatar
Consummate
 
Posts: 494 [View]
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 5:04 pm
Location: Blaine

PreviousNext

Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron