westhope wrote:Good reading.
I disagree with his statement that a small 38 Special is slower to get repeated shots than a 9 mm. I've ran many IDPA BUG matches that the J-frame shooters are just as fast (and accurate) as the 9 mm shooters.
Recommended reading for everyone.
westhope wrote:Good reading.
I disagree with his statement that a small 38 Special is slower to get repeated shots than a 9 mm. I've ran many IDPA BUG matches that the J-frame shooters are just as fast (and accurate) as the 9 mm shooters.
Recommended reading for everyone.
Jeff Bergquist wrote:westhope wrote:Good reading.
I disagree with his statement that a small 38 Special is slower to get repeated shots than a 9 mm. I've ran many IDPA BUG matches that the J-frame shooters are just as fast (and accurate) as the 9 mm shooters.
Recommended reading for everyone.
Then perhaps any disparity in results could be because a revolver in .38 special might be the most common defensive handgun owned by people otherwise unfamiliar with handguns.
Snowgun wrote:.40 S&W: Not powerful enough to make up for the snap
grousemaster wrote:I just don't see any advantage to carrying a .45 when you consider the compromises you have to make (capacity, size of pistol, ammo cost). The ONLY advantage I see for the .45 is the 1911 platform....which we all love.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests