slo squeezin wrote:Works great but shoots consistently low at 25', 2-3"
Do you mean 25 feet, or 25 yards? If you mean feet, you'll need to send it in for warranty repair. That is more than a simple sight change will be able to correct.
As far as Sig sight heights go, a higher rear sight number (taller) will raise the point of impact, but a smaller front sight number (taller) will lower the point of impact. Changing the front sight one number will move POI one inch at 25 yards, changing the rear sight one number will move the POI two inches at 25 yards. A change of the front sight by .005" is equal to one sight number, where a change of the rear height by .010" is equal to one sight number.
.40 and .45 caliber Sigs come with a #6 front and #8 rear sight. 9mm and .357 Sigs come with a #8 front and #8 rear. You could either replace your front (currently #6) with a #10, or your rear (currently #8) with a #10, either of which will raise the POI 4" at 25 yards. If you are going to replace the front with a fiber optic anyways, I'd recommend replacing the front. Especially when the front change is lower, and the rear change is higher. Lower sights are less likely to snag on things coming out of the holster from under a concealment garment.
This is one of the best fiber optic front sights you can get for a Sig. Their .150 tall sight is equivalent to the #10 (although they label it as a #9, I think its a typo or math error on their part. The #6 and #8 are labelled correctly), which would raise your POI by 4 inches.
http://www.dawsonprecision.com/ProductD ... 1278686599Note that Sig pistols come setup with a different sight picture than you may be used to. Below are 3 common sight pictures, Sig uses sight picture #3

#1 - Bullseye AKA 6:00 Hold
#2 - Traditional
#3 - Combat
One advantage to #3 is that in low light using night sights, POI is directly behind the glowing dot, as you may not be able to make out the sight outline. Another advantage is when using fiber optic sights when flash sighting, for the same reason - the glowing dot will attract the eye and shots will place directly behind it. The disadvantage (other than it being different from what a lot of people are used to) is that it does completely cover the POI, making accurate shots on small targets more difficult. Personally, I prefer the traditional sight picture at 25 yards.
If you're not going to be using night sights, you should also consider using a solid black rear sight. After a little practice, centering the fiber dot in the rear is easy. A lot of people (myself included) find having a bunch of dots to line up to be very visually noisy. It's too easy for your brain to grab the wrong dot as your aligning your sights, which can either slow you down as you shift focus to the front sight, or result in a loss of accuracy if your focus is on the rear sight. It's very hard to train your brain to consistently lock onto the front dot rather than the rear dots in the time it takes to develop a flash sight picture. This may also result in shooting better/worse depending on the lighting conditions on the gun. I've found that by simplifying the sight picture by eliminating excess clutter, the brain is able to lock onto the front sight more easily, resulting in a faster and more accurate alignment. Something to consider anyway.
Hope this helps!