CZ PCR vs. P-01

[gun_fan111]

Was looking at CZ PCR and P-01 today and could not make up my mind on which to get? What do you guys think?

I doubt I will ever use a rail on a compact 9 so that is not a deciding factor for me but is the only difference I could find.

Are there internal differences between the two that should be considered? Sights looked different, is one type easier to replace than other?

Thanks!

[LarryFlew]

Pcr has load indicator and no snag sights. Both are decockers. Othewise rail is the main difference.

[yuppiejr]

At this point the internals are the same, early in its life the PCR had a different, and I felt superior, trigger. After the NATO standard P01 came out the PCR was less common until it was reissued with similar guts and components to the compact and P01 models. I personally prefer the Novak low pro sights and narrower slide of the PCR over the P01, they feel and function the same otherwise.

[gun_fan111]

Thanks guys.

[Ty179]

At this point the internals are the same, early in its life the PCR had a different, and I felt superior, trigger. After the NATO standard P01 came out the PCR was less common until it was reissued with similar guts and components to the compact and P01 models. I personally prefer the Novak low pro sights and narrower slide of the PCR over the P01, they feel and function the same otherwise.

Exactly. The thinner muzzle profile and Novak style sights really sell the PCR. From a carry perspective, it's superior.

From a range only perspective? That's a personal choice. You really can't go wrong either way!