Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Discussion of handguns

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Rodentman on Fri May 09, 2014 3:39 pm

I am not gonna fire that.
User avatar
Rodentman
 
Posts: 2740 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:22 am

Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Ron Burgundy on Fri May 09, 2014 3:54 pm

I think he should be wearing a helmet
User avatar
Ron Burgundy
 
Posts: 981 [View]
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:28 pm

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Ghost on Fri May 09, 2014 6:57 pm

I've got the 5" 460. It's for my time I spend in Alaska I'm sure the 500 has an edge but the calibers and hunting ability trumped the minute chance I'll have to use it up there. But I've carried much smaller while camping/hiking in Alaska too. I enjoy shooting all three calibers out of it and I agree the 454 is closer to the 460 than the 45. The 460 is such a quality made firearm that it to me is a lot of fun shooting the 45LC especially at the Lakeville Gander where I hate throwing my brass away and an hour of 460 would quickly line up people watching from outside and clear out the other lanes.

I let a friend shoot it last trip to that Gander and I was amazed in the felt concussion while standing back near the glass vs shooting it. It's quickly becoming one of my favorite guns to shoot.
User avatar
Ghost
 
Posts: 8246 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:49 pm

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Rodentman on Fri May 09, 2014 8:04 pm

I fire the 460 and 500 at BPR in the rifle bay. The concussion is quite impressive. I've blown fuses in the target carrier several times. I have the 8.375" bbl with a scope so there isn't a huge muzzle rise, but a substantial push into the shoulder, which has a constant ache lately.
User avatar
Rodentman
 
Posts: 2740 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:22 am

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby xd ED on Fri May 09, 2014 8:11 pm

Ghost wrote:I've got the 5" 460. It's for my time I spend in Alaska I'm sure the 500 has an edge but the calibers and hunting ability trumped the minute chance I'll have to use it up there. But I've carried much smaller while camping/hiking in Alaska too. I enjoy shooting all three calibers out of it and I agree the 454 is closer to the 460 than the 45. The 460 is such a quality made firearm that it to me is a lot of fun shooting the 45LC especially at the Lakeville Gander where I hate throwing my brass away and an hour of 460 would quickly line up people watching from outside and clear out the other lanes.

I let a friend shoot it last trip to that Gander and I was amazed in the felt concussion while standing back near the glass vs shooting it. It's quickly becoming one of my favorite guns to shoot.


It's threads like this and posts like yours that end up costing me money :hmm:

Edited:
How did you holster the 5" 460?
(Just read the relevant woods holster thread)
Last edited by xd ED on Fri May 09, 2014 8:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
LET'S GO BRANDON
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9035 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Rodentman on Fri May 09, 2014 8:15 pm

It's kind of offputting at first to see charges in the range of 40g-50g of powder. Quite a change switching to reloading 9mm. Feels like I need a microscope.
User avatar
Rodentman
 
Posts: 2740 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:22 am

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Rodentman on Fri May 09, 2014 8:18 pm

Here's the 4" X frame 500 in a holster:

Image

And the 460...

Image
User avatar
Rodentman
 
Posts: 2740 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:22 am

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby xd ED on Fri May 09, 2014 8:19 pm

Rodentman wrote:It's kind of offputting at first to see charges in the range of 40g-50g of powder. Quite a change switching to reloading 9mm. Feels like I need a microscope.


I hadn't yet considered that aspect of it, but yes, that's different. You could use a kitchen measuring scoop and motor oil funnel.
LET'S GO BRANDON
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9035 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Rodentman on Fri May 09, 2014 8:22 pm

I have to use an intermediate funnel, so to speak, to charge the cases since the drop tube on the 3BR won't accommodate 50 cal brass. Of course I don't load hundreds at one sitting.
User avatar
Rodentman
 
Posts: 2740 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:22 am

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby xd ED on Fri May 09, 2014 8:23 pm

Rodentman wrote:Here's the 4" X frame 500 in a holster:

Image

And the 460...

Image


Is it shadow/ illusion, or are the grips different?
...and the 4" bbl ends up 11"+....
LET'S GO BRANDON
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9035 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Ghost on Fri May 09, 2014 9:11 pm

Just a word of caution for first time shooters of these. It's a good idea to load only one round or skip load it because when some people fight the recoil they may double fire the gun and sometimes in a less than ideal direction. There was a girl whom was killed from this scenario, her "friends" thought it'd be neat to watch her shoot something she wasn't prepared for.
User avatar
Ghost
 
Posts: 8246 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:49 pm

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby gunsmith on Fri May 09, 2014 9:16 pm

Rodentman wrote:Here's the 4" X frame 500 in a holster:

Image



Do they make a 2" barrel version of this and call it a Bear Gun?
User avatar
gunsmith
 
Posts: 1904 [View]
Joined: Mon May 06, 2013 2:18 pm

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Ghost on Fri May 09, 2014 9:31 pm

gunsmith wrote:
Rodentman wrote:Here's the 4" X frame 500 in a holster:

Image



Do they make a 2" barrel version of this and call it a Bear Gun?

Yes, they did. Look up Smith and Wesson bear survival kit. I'm on my phone so I can't easily link photos or I would have linked it.
User avatar
Ghost
 
Posts: 8246 [View]
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:49 pm

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Seismic Sam on Sat May 10, 2014 10:09 am

Yes, there is a 2" snubbie. perhaps the worst idea ever in cutting down the length of the barrel for some minimal loss in weight. You're probably losing 30% or more of your muzzle velocity, and all you'll do if you miss is really piss the bear off because you burned all the hair off his nose. And if you were so foolish as to shoot one of the Smith 500 rounds with the Barnes 500 grain solid bullet, the bullet would probably be longer than the barrel!! :( :o :shock: :?

5" is about as low as I would go in a Smith 500, as the 8 3/8" is a bit cumbersome to unholster.
User avatar
Seismic Sam
Gone but not forgotten
 
Posts: 5515 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:02 pm
Location: Pass By-You, Loosianana

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

Postby Lumpy on Sat May 10, 2014 10:31 am

Seismic Sam wrote:Yes, there is a 2" snubbie. perhaps the worst idea ever in cutting down the length of the barrel for some minimal loss in weight. You're probably losing 30% or more of your muzzle velocity, and all you'll do if you miss is really piss the bear off because you burned all the hair off his nose. And if you were so foolish as to shoot one of the Smith 500 rounds with the Barnes 500 grain solid bullet, the bullet would probably be longer than the barrel!! :( :o :shock: :?


Image

This violates Lumpy's Revolver Rule: No revolver should have a barrel shorter than it's cylinder.

5" is about as low as I would go in a Smith 500, as the 8 3/8" is a bit cumbersome to unholster.

There's always the Colt Buntline Special. :mrgreen:

Image
User avatar
Lumpy
 
Posts: 2740 [View]
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:54 pm
Location: North of Lowry, West of Penn

PreviousNext

Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron