PRS wrote:Do i recommend changing the sights, yes... do i say improve your trigger, of course... but butcher your frame into some tacticool stippled mess, damn right a say bs...
PRS wrote:1. I would never add a beaver tail to a 1911 because i would never buy one without one on it in the first place.... 2. adding beaver tail to a glock? what games do you play that adding a beaver tail is legal? uspsa... nope... idpa... only in one division. oh and changing your grip profile isn't legal either.
EJSG19 wrote:geez, for those of you who the concept of a grip reduction on a Glock is foreign... you need to get out from under your rock.
This has been very popular for avid Glock shooters for many years. It's no secret that many consider the Glock grip to be overly large from the factory. What's wrong with making it more comfortable or more functional to shoot?
Heaven forbid somebody change the grip panels on their 1911, or put one of the Hogue grip condoms on their gun, or pacmayr wrap around grips... etc. Nobody does that...
to say somebody shouldn't customize their gun to their liking is sort of silly, considering almost everyone does it.
but, this is mnguntalk...
PRS wrote:Ha well you got me there... considering you can do anything to your gun in open and damn near anything now in limited, yes it would be legal. And it's always a good idea to make your gun lighter when shooting major.....
gun_fan111 wrote:Question - does it actually reduce the width of the grip by making the grip walls thinner? Or simply removing finger grooves does that?
I would think the length of the grip is irrelevant and simply stippling would maintain the same width.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests