Page 2 of 3

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 3:39 pm
by Rodentman
I am not gonna fire that.

Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 3:54 pm
by Ron Burgundy
I think he should be wearing a helmet

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 6:57 pm
by Ghost
I've got the 5" 460. It's for my time I spend in Alaska I'm sure the 500 has an edge but the calibers and hunting ability trumped the minute chance I'll have to use it up there. But I've carried much smaller while camping/hiking in Alaska too. I enjoy shooting all three calibers out of it and I agree the 454 is closer to the 460 than the 45. The 460 is such a quality made firearm that it to me is a lot of fun shooting the 45LC especially at the Lakeville Gander where I hate throwing my brass away and an hour of 460 would quickly line up people watching from outside and clear out the other lanes.

I let a friend shoot it last trip to that Gander and I was amazed in the felt concussion while standing back near the glass vs shooting it. It's quickly becoming one of my favorite guns to shoot.

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 8:04 pm
by Rodentman
I fire the 460 and 500 at BPR in the rifle bay. The concussion is quite impressive. I've blown fuses in the target carrier several times. I have the 8.375" bbl with a scope so there isn't a huge muzzle rise, but a substantial push into the shoulder, which has a constant ache lately.

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 8:11 pm
by xd ED
Ghost wrote:I've got the 5" 460. It's for my time I spend in Alaska I'm sure the 500 has an edge but the calibers and hunting ability trumped the minute chance I'll have to use it up there. But I've carried much smaller while camping/hiking in Alaska too. I enjoy shooting all three calibers out of it and I agree the 454 is closer to the 460 than the 45. The 460 is such a quality made firearm that it to me is a lot of fun shooting the 45LC especially at the Lakeville Gander where I hate throwing my brass away and an hour of 460 would quickly line up people watching from outside and clear out the other lanes.

I let a friend shoot it last trip to that Gander and I was amazed in the felt concussion while standing back near the glass vs shooting it. It's quickly becoming one of my favorite guns to shoot.


It's threads like this and posts like yours that end up costing me money :hmm:

Edited:
How did you holster the 5" 460?
(Just read the relevant woods holster thread)

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 8:15 pm
by Rodentman
It's kind of offputting at first to see charges in the range of 40g-50g of powder. Quite a change switching to reloading 9mm. Feels like I need a microscope.

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 8:18 pm
by Rodentman
Here's the 4" X frame 500 in a holster:

Image

And the 460...

Image

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 8:19 pm
by xd ED
Rodentman wrote:It's kind of offputting at first to see charges in the range of 40g-50g of powder. Quite a change switching to reloading 9mm. Feels like I need a microscope.


I hadn't yet considered that aspect of it, but yes, that's different. You could use a kitchen measuring scoop and motor oil funnel.

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 8:22 pm
by Rodentman
I have to use an intermediate funnel, so to speak, to charge the cases since the drop tube on the 3BR won't accommodate 50 cal brass. Of course I don't load hundreds at one sitting.

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 8:23 pm
by xd ED
Rodentman wrote:Here's the 4" X frame 500 in a holster:

Image

And the 460...

Image


Is it shadow/ illusion, or are the grips different?
...and the 4" bbl ends up 11"+....

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 9:11 pm
by Ghost
Just a word of caution for first time shooters of these. It's a good idea to load only one round or skip load it because when some people fight the recoil they may double fire the gun and sometimes in a less than ideal direction. There was a girl whom was killed from this scenario, her "friends" thought it'd be neat to watch her shoot something she wasn't prepared for.

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 9:16 pm
by gunsmith
Rodentman wrote:Here's the 4" X frame 500 in a holster:

Image



Do they make a 2" barrel version of this and call it a Bear Gun?

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 9:31 pm
by Ghost
gunsmith wrote:
Rodentman wrote:Here's the 4" X frame 500 in a holster:

Image



Do they make a 2" barrel version of this and call it a Bear Gun?

Yes, they did. Look up Smith and Wesson bear survival kit. I'm on my phone so I can't easily link photos or I would have linked it.

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 10:09 am
by Seismic Sam
Yes, there is a 2" snubbie. perhaps the worst idea ever in cutting down the length of the barrel for some minimal loss in weight. You're probably losing 30% or more of your muzzle velocity, and all you'll do if you miss is really piss the bear off because you burned all the hair off his nose. And if you were so foolish as to shoot one of the Smith 500 rounds with the Barnes 500 grain solid bullet, the bullet would probably be longer than the barrel!! :( :o :shock: :?

5" is about as low as I would go in a Smith 500, as the 8 3/8" is a bit cumbersome to unholster.

Re: Popular .460 Mag vs. unpopular S&W .500

PostPosted: Sat May 10, 2014 10:31 am
by Lumpy
Seismic Sam wrote:Yes, there is a 2" snubbie. perhaps the worst idea ever in cutting down the length of the barrel for some minimal loss in weight. You're probably losing 30% or more of your muzzle velocity, and all you'll do if you miss is really piss the bear off because you burned all the hair off his nose. And if you were so foolish as to shoot one of the Smith 500 rounds with the Barnes 500 grain solid bullet, the bullet would probably be longer than the barrel!! :( :o :shock: :?


Image

This violates Lumpy's Revolver Rule: No revolver should have a barrel shorter than it's cylinder.

5" is about as low as I would go in a Smith 500, as the 8 3/8" is a bit cumbersome to unholster.

There's always the Colt Buntline Special. :mrgreen:

Image