I've been trying to decide between a ruger lcr and a Smith 642 for months now... I'm going to shoot both of them tomorrow with the intention of buying one. I have been looking up individual reviews on each of them and they're all positive reviews. I've also been looking up comparison reviews and I have found alot of great reviews and discussions on the two. It seems that the lcr is favored about 60% of the time. With out having shot either gun, I'm leaning more towards the s&w. I've been to j&s custom guns a few times and to gander a few times to handle them both. Neither one is uncomfortable to hold. The lcr seems a little more bulky in the grip and it also seems to have a better trigger pull... but its just butt ugly, and ruger doesn't have the track record of s&w. The 642 has been around for decades and from what I've read is one of s&w's best sellers. Its not gonna be the gun I go shooting all day with, but ill definitely throw a few rounds through each range visit. its mainly gonna be my carry piece when carrying my g19 isn't logical, like on my motorcycle. I've also heard that after a few thousand rounds the s&w trigger greatly improves. But we'll see what happens at the range.
Any feed back from people who have/do own both?