by Molasses on Wed Mar 26, 2008 5:45 pm
I've got both, but they're practically identical long barrelled Performance Center models that I've scoped. Please keep that in mind while reading my thoughts/opinions/experiences, as things might be a mite different with the short barrels you've indicated interest in.
The .500 is a lot of fun. Mine has never had anything other than handloads run through it, due to the ridiculous cost of factory ammo in the caliber. Remington offers a 385gr. bullet for handloading that's pretty cheap and for data, John at GunStop has a nice load using H110 that he recommends with this bullet that delivers about 1,700-1,800 FPS. I've also picked up a mould for it and plan on cranking out some cheapo projectiles for even cheaper plinking after the weather gets warmer.
I fell in love with this configuration enough and was impressed enough by the introductory writeup on the .460 in Shooting Times that when I stumbled across a "twin" .460 at Capra's about the time the first "regular" .460s were appearing in town, it followed me home.
Quite frankly, if the .460 had been introduced before the .500, I might not have one of each. It turns in 200 yd groups off the bench using the Hornady 200gr factory load that are about the same size or smaller than the .500 does at 100yds. Recoil is somewhat lighter, although the muzzle blast is worse (neither is a prize in that department and you DON'T want to fire one without hearing protection, even hunting). The only deer I've brought down with it was at a lased 140yds and there weren't any issues...other than that the cylinder gap blast ruined a pair of hunting mittens that I'd taken off and used as padding on my impromptu round bale rest. The only issues I've got are that it's not as fun to play with at normal handgunning distances as it's big brother and the last time I looked, Hornady still hadn't offered that same 200gr projectile from their factory loads as a component. Oh, and I wonder about the benefits of the .460 in a short barrel; IMHO, its' strong suit is in velocity and long-range potential and I can't help but wonder how much of that is lost with a short tube.