.357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Discussion of handguns

why choose .357 Sig over .40?!

.357 "sounds" cool!
8
10%
.357 is faster ... faster is always better!
5
6%
I prefer reloading bottle-necked pistol brass!
3
3%
I prefer paying more for "practice" ammo!
1
1%
I don't practice!
2
2%
I don't know how to drop-in a new recoil spring in a .40!
1
1%
.357 is a better "man stopper"!
7
8%
.40 is "short 'n weak"!
7
8%
I carry a .40 ... I ain't skeered!
14
17%
I carry a .45 ... ya'll may as well be carrying slingshots!
31
39%
 
Total votes : 79

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby illbits on Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:47 pm

I can fit 25 rounds of .357 sig in a 22-round glock mag with a +2 extension!
illbits
 
Posts: 607 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 7:54 pm
Location: NE Minneapolis

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby grousemaster on Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:33 pm

illbits wrote:I can fit 25 rounds of .357 sig in a 22-round glock mag with a +2 extension!


.357 Sig rounds are the same size as .40 rounds, so it sounds like a +3 extension to me!
01 FFL
NRA Life Member
NRA Business Alliance
User avatar
grousemaster
 
Posts: 3493 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Waconia

Re: Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby goett047 on Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:58 pm

grousemaster wrote:
illbits wrote:I can fit 25 rounds of .357 sig in a 22-round glock mag with a +2 extension!


.357 Sig rounds are the same size as .40 rounds, so it sounds like a +3 extension to me!

Not if you load them in a 9 mm case

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 2
User avatar
goett047
 
Posts: 1821 [View]
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 8:27 pm
Location: Anoka, Minnesota

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby Pat Cannon on Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:43 pm

If you can't stop the bad guy with first 20 rounds, you should probably save the last 5 for yourself.
User avatar
Pat Cannon
 
Posts: 3894 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: South Minneapolis

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby gyrfalcon on Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:12 am

Pat Cannon wrote:If you can't stop the bad guy with first 20 rounds, you should probably save the last 5 for yourself.


bad guys... because when that platoon attacks you the caliber of your pistol is really going to count.
"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without." -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
gyrfalcon
 
Posts: 3467 [View]
Joined: Sat May 08, 2010 1:34 pm

Re: Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby goett047 on Fri Aug 24, 2012 5:01 am

gyrfalcon wrote:
Pat Cannon wrote:If you can't stop the bad guy with first 20 rounds, you should probably save the last 5 for yourself.


bad guys... because when that platoon attacks you the caliber of your pistol is really going to count.

Ask Sgt York :-)
User avatar
goett047
 
Posts: 1821 [View]
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 8:27 pm
Location: Anoka, Minnesota

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby rugersol on Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:42 am

Pat Cannon wrote:If you can't stop the bad guy with first 20 rounds, you should probably save the last 5 for yourself.

Image
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby XDM45 on Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:06 am

I don't see anything wrong with 9mm, .357 or .40, to each their own... but my personal preference is the .45ACP round x 14 (1 in the chamber and 13 in the mag of my XDm.)
Gnothi Seauton
User avatar
XDM45
 
Posts: 2904 [View]
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:01 am
Location: Minneapolis/Saint Paul, MN

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby rugersol on Fri Aug 24, 2012 7:34 am

how 'bout these?! ...

Image

Image

I really didn't wanna try to argue the details ... but in trying to link to something that simply made my point for me, I was unable to find anything I thought did a good 'nuff job, of it!

Anyhow ... some more food fer thought! ...

• as has been stated, a common reason for selecting the .357 Sig is the venerable "125gr JHP" (presumably moving at 1,300fps+) ... why?! ... #1 answer: "it's the best proven man-stopper" ... based on?! ... probly Marhsal & Sanow ... anything else?! :|

• presuming the Marshal & Sanow data is correct ... and that it does in fact show that the "125gr JHP" is superior ... some observations can be made to bring it into question ...

• what timeframe are we talking about, here?! ... is this 30yr+ ago?! ... before 9mm and .40 have had a chance to "be counted"?!

• how many of these "125gr JHP" victories were from a .357 Sig ... and not otherwise a .357 revolver?! ... if you were shooting to save your life, and had only 6rd ... wouldn't you make a point to be more accurate, with 'em?!

• if ya hit a bad guy in the arm with a "125gr JHP", will he still die instantly?! ... or does it actually matter WHERE ya hit 'em?! :o

• let's say, for one second, that accuracy is #1, bar none ... could we then conclude from the Marshal & Sanow data that the "125gr JHP" has simply been shot by more superior marksmen, than any other?! :ugeek:

• there's also a psychological aspect! ... a "willingness to continue" ... simply because someone's been struck by a "125gr JHP", and collapsed, does not mean they died ... at that moment!

• conversely, someone on considerable drugs, or adrenaline, might very well require additional hits, regardless!

• who typically carried .357 revolvers?! ... traffic cops?! ... detectives?! ... what types of calls were they likely to respond to?! ... was one more likely to encounter a suspect well after the "heat of the moment" ... in a more "relaxed state"?!

• given nearly an identical weight bullet ... in a nearly identical diameter ... at a nearly identical velocity ... exhibiting nearly identical results in gelatin ... are we honestly to believe that one has some sort of mystical qualities, inherent merely by its moniker?! :?

I'm not really bent outta shape over .357 Sig! Image ... but I can't help but wonder why it's still around?! Marketing aside, I can't even appreciate why it was ever created?! :shock:

As Sam pointed out, 9x23 is jest as well! ... I'm too lazy to look it up, but if 9mm+P+ can't quite make it, I'm sure it wouldn't take much to develop a new, comparably sized case, that would! (presuming typical owners would still want/need a narrower grip than the 9x23 otherwise affords?!) ... a round that keeps the original 9mm rim diameter, but still delivers these magical ballistic numbers, I could appreciate!

Ultimately, if .40 is "short 'n weak", when necked-down, it's simply "short 'n weaker"! Image ... what remains is simply a matter of what can otherwise easily be overcome by a new $8 spring! ;)

That ain't to say, anyone carrying a .357 Sig is in any kinda jeopardy! :roll: ... at the very least, they've got a very hot 9mm! ... I'm sure it'll do jest fine! 8-)

Only, I can otherwise see no way in which it might be superior to other popular choices! :|
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby Seismic Sam on Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:11 am

And if you want to really talk ultimate 9mm performance, there is the 9x25 Dillon, which is the 10mm case necked down to 9mm, and velocities are humongous Doubletap has a 125 grain Defensive load that goes 1700 fps for 800 ft-lbs... :( :o :shock: :?

And to echo the previous sentiment, leaving 10mm out of the original poll is kind of ignoring the elephant in the room
User avatar
Seismic Sam
Gone but not forgotten
 
Posts: 5515 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 1:02 pm
Location: Pass By-You, Loosianana

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby grousemaster on Fri Aug 24, 2012 9:56 am

The .40 short and weak delivers more energy on target than the .45 with similar penetration and better barrier penetration. Plus it comes in a 9mm size frame and generally has a higher capacity. What's short and weak about it? Is it just because it's not as powerful as the 10mm? The .45 isn't as powerful as the 10mm either.
01 FFL
NRA Life Member
NRA Business Alliance
User avatar
grousemaster
 
Posts: 3493 [View]
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:44 pm
Location: Waconia

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby rugersol on Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:02 am

Seismic Sam wrote:leaving 10mm out of the original poll is kind of ignoring the elephant in the room

The poll was intended to tally .40 vs. .357 Sig, as they are so similar!

I added .45, for fun! ;)

I didn't include 10mm ... or 9mm ... or .44-40 ... or .32-20 ... et. al. :roll:

Moreover, the context is "self-defense" ... and under $1,000, in 10mm, most folks are limited to EAA, a Glock 20/29, or a Colt Delta Elite ... where preferable carry guns appear to be the smaller Glocks, XD's, M&P's, and various other single-stack lightweight guns, it appears, for all intents and purposes, 10mm is simply not a viable option! :o

More, moreover, I'd suggest, if one desires .357-type ballistics for defensive use, one should take a closer look at .38 Super ... and if one desires heavier bullets, one should take a closer look at .45 ACP! ... 10mm offers little more than an "out of the box" semi-auto better suited to "hunting"! ... otherwise a .45 ACP 5.25 XDM with heavy springs and .45 Super brass can approach (typical) .44 Mag numbers! :shock:

Then again, for hunting with a handgun, everyone knows a .300 BLK AR pistol trumps all others! :mrgreen:
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby tazdevil on Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:05 am

Why does this remind me of a thread I started a long time ago.....Oh that's right, I started a more evil thread than this one, the 9 versus 40 or 45! The horror! THE HORROR!

The 357 sig round sounds interesting, I need to go try it out someday.
1911 Fan quote in memoirium about carrying:
The purpose of a firearm in a defensive situation is to make the other guy leak from holes he was not born with. Your job is to install those orifices for him.
User avatar
tazdevil
 
Posts: 905 [View]
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2010 7:52 pm
Location: over your shoulder, whispering sweet nothings in your ear.

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby tman on Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:10 am

rugersol wrote:
I'm not really bent outta shape over .357 Sig! Image ... but I can't help but wonder why it's still around?! Marketing aside, I can't even appreciate why it was ever created?!


My guess:

.357 Sig fits in the frame of a 9mm-sized automatic whereas .357 magnum doesn't. 13-15 rounds, vs 6 or 7 from Pat's wheel gun with nearly the same ballistics. I've never shot anything in .357 Sig, so I don't know about recoil with it. Didn't some say it's comparable to 9mm?

It is perhaps marketing, but it seems to be more accepted than Glock's .45GAP...
Badged Thug & MN Permit to Carry Instructor
Slowly growing 1911 Glock collection. Donations accepted
User avatar
tman
 
Posts: 2981 [View]
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: Centrally isolated in Northern MN

Re: .357 Sig vs. .40?! ... vs. .45?!

Postby rugersol on Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:16 am

tman wrote:
rugersol wrote:
I'm not really bent outta shape over .357 Sig! Image ... but I can't help but wonder why it's still around?! Marketing aside, I can't even appreciate why it was ever created?!


My guess:

.357 Sig fits in the frame of a 9mm-sized automatic whereas .357 magnum doesn't. 13-15 rounds, vs 6 or 7 from Pat's wheel gun with nearly the same ballistics. I've never shot anything in .357 Sig, so I don't know about recoil with it. Didn't some say it's comparable to 9mm?

No question ... vs. a revolver, it's got a lot to love!

My point was, why not a .40, instead?!

I suppose, it's possible, a 125gr bullet traveling a bit faster, might yield a bit less recoil, than a 135gr bullet traveling a bit slower ... I'd think the weight of the gun, itself, would be an overriding factor ... but I have no proof! :(

tman wrote:It is perhaps marketing, but it seems to be more accepted than Glock's .45GAP...

At least .45 GAP served a purpose! ... that no one cared, is somewhat irrelevant! :?
"as to the Colt's Commander, a pox on you for selling this after I made the house payment." - Pete RIP
"I, for one, welcome our new Moderator Overlords ..." - Squib Joe
User avatar
rugersol
 
Posts: 5691 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:33 am

PreviousNext

Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron