Single stack vs single stack?

Discussion of handguns

Single stack vs single stack?

Postby Tronster on Mon Apr 01, 2013 11:05 pm

So why is there a general attitude amongst gun owners that a single stack .45 1911 with 8 rounds is more than enough to defend against an attacker, but a single stack 9mm holding 8 rounds is hardly adequate? Does anyone really feel under armed with an 8 shot 9mm?

They both hold the same capacity, but the 9mm is generally smaller, lighter, softer shooting, and cheaper to practice with.
(BTW I sometimes carry a Sig P6. I've tried carrying pistols with 15 or 17 round mags but is awfully heavy.)
Tronster
 
Posts: 552 [View]
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:07 pm
Location: Rochester

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby Pat Cannon on Tue Apr 02, 2013 12:35 am

It's because one round of .45 ACP will drop the biggest toughest attacker every single time, whereas 8 hits with 9mm will only enrage them and they'll kill you while you're trying to stuff a fresh magazine into that skinny little mag well.
User avatar
Pat Cannon
 
Posts: 3894 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:32 pm
Location: South Minneapolis

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby FJ540 on Tue Apr 02, 2013 1:13 am

230gr of .45 will do more damage than 124gr of 9mm every time.

9mm isn't as bad as Pat makes it out though. :lol: SD ammo has come a long way in the pip squeak calibers.
User avatar
FJ540
 
Posts: 6834 [View]
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:44 pm
Location: Rock Ridge

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby Ron Burgundy on Tue Apr 02, 2013 5:54 am

Pat Cannon wrote:It's because one round of .45 ACP will drop the biggest toughest attacker every single time, whereas 8 hits with 9mm will only enrage them and they'll kill you while you're trying to stuff a fresh magazine into that skinny little mag well.

^^^this
User avatar
Ron Burgundy
 
Posts: 981 [View]
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:28 pm

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby Thunder71 on Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:21 am

You can make 9mm get larger, you can't make 45 get smaller.
User avatar
Thunder71
 
Posts: 3096 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:43 pm
Location: SE

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby Tronster on Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:40 am

Oh good grief, all pistol rounds are weak. It's about shot placement. :roll:

But besides being a 9/45 debate, a 9mm is just easier to carry and just having a pistol on you when the cards are on the table is the first step. I'm just tired of hearing how a 1911 (as nice as they are) is the holy grail of real man carry guns. I doubt those same people even carry it half the time that someone with a 9mm does.
Tronster
 
Posts: 552 [View]
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:07 pm
Location: Rochester

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby XDM45 on Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:06 am

Well, I OC an XDm with a 13 round mag + 1 for 14, plus a spare 13 round mag for a total of 27 for that firearm. Once I get good enough with it, I plan on CCing as a backup, my XDs with 2 7-round mags (1 in the gun and 1 spare) + 1 in the chamber for a total of 15. I figure 42 rounds ought to be enough, (even for that ain't-ever-gonna-happen-mall-zombie-attack-situation), don't ya think?

The XDm is a double stack, the XDs is a single stack, so soon I'll do both.

As for 9 vs. 45, it's an old debate like OC vs. CC is. 9mm is cheaper, I sure wouldn't want to get shot with one, and I agree, it's shot placement that matters most of all because your goal is to stop the threat.

My reasoning for a .45ACP is simply because a) it will cause severe blood loss (with the right shot placements and type of ammo) and b) it will provide one heck of a shock to their nervous system (as will many calibers), so that's why for me...making cavities and shocking the system to stop the threat.
Gnothi Seauton
User avatar
XDM45
 
Posts: 2904 [View]
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:01 am
Location: Minneapolis/Saint Paul, MN

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby MasonK on Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:24 am

Because .45 ACP is a heat-seeking bullet with a bonded core made not of lead, but of magic.

To wit, one round of .45 shot in the general direction of a BG will cause him to disappear in a puff of smoke and erase his ancestors back to the dawn of creation. ;)

This is a Ford vs. Chevy argument that has no real answer. I used to swear by my .44 Magnum, now I carry 9mm.

//Grabbing popcorn, this is going to be a fun thread.
MasonK
 
Posts: 273 [View]
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:03 am

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby Thunder71 on Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:30 am

Tronster wrote:But besides being a 9/45 debate, a 9mm is just easier to carry and just having a pistol on you when the cards are on the table is the first step.


Please explain how a 9 is easier to carry.

9mm on the left, 45 on the right. I actually get faster and more accurate follow up shots with my XD-S 45 than my XD-M 9mm. I think the answer here is to carry what you shoot best, and what you will actually carry.

The argument of I carry a 9mm because a hit with a 9 is better than a miss with a 45 is just plain stupid.

Image
User avatar
Thunder71
 
Posts: 3096 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:43 pm
Location: SE

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby xd ED on Tue Apr 02, 2013 7:41 am

Tronster wrote:But besides being a 9/45 debate, a 9mm is just easier to carry and just having a pistol on you when the cards are on the table is the first step.


:shock:


Image
Image
LET'S GO BRANDON
User avatar
xd ED
 
Posts: 9046 [View]
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 6:28 pm
Location: Saint Paul

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby Tronster on Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:10 am

my arguement is single stack 9 vs 45 your double stack examples dont apply here
Tronster
 
Posts: 552 [View]
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:07 pm
Location: Rochester

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby JustPlainT on Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:11 am

I think the reason is that the fanboys have accepted and defend the 1911 to the grave, regardless of actual merit.

Not knocking the 1911, but it is what it is: a single stack of .45 ACP.

Meanwhile, people are getting more and more used to double stack wonder-nines that hold 15+ rounds, every time. So when an ultra slim single stack comes out, they get cranky because they can't have their crazy capacity and don't get how physics works and how you can't fit them into that space.

Pat Cannon wrote:It's because one round of .45 ACP will drop the biggest toughest attacker every single time, whereas 8 hits with 9mm will only enrage them and they'll kill you while you're trying to stuff a fresh magazine into that skinny little mag well.


This better be a joke.
Midwest Defense Institute, LLC
Quality Training at an Affordable Cost
User avatar
JustPlainT
 
Posts: 288 [View]
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:03 pm

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby goalie on Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:11 am

FJ540 wrote:230gr of .45 will do more damage than 124gr of 9mm every time.


Not true.
It turns out that what you have is less important than what you do with it.
User avatar
goalie
 
Posts: 3812 [View]
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 2:45 pm

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby damian_mb on Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:23 am

I think I am more worried about capacity rather than "knock" down power (which doesn't really exist). Any SD ammo will make the other person think twice about taking that extra step forward.
"It can never happen in Amurika"
damian_mb
 
Posts: 243 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 12:47 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Single stack vs single stack?

Postby Holland&Holland on Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:32 am

If you reall want to defend yourself get a Ma Duece otherwise you are just joking around.
User avatar
Holland&Holland
 
Posts: 12533 [View]
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:17 am

Next

Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests

cron