TTS wrote:I have one of the full size Sig 1911's and it is the most reliable 1911 I have ever owned. The odd slide shape makes it more difficult to find holsters, but everything else about the gun makes up for it.
They are both great guns from great companies, you can't go wrong with either. They are within $100 of each other on Budsgunshop.com.
ETA: The Ruger has a number of MIM parts where the Sig does not and the Sig has front strap checkering.
sawgrass wrote:TTS wrote:I have one of the full size Sig 1911's and it is the most reliable 1911 I have ever owned. The odd slide shape makes it more difficult to find holsters, but everything else about the gun makes up for it.
They are both great guns from great companies, you can't go wrong with either. They are within $100 of each other on Budsgunshop.com.
ETA: The Ruger has a number of MIM parts where the Sig does not and the Sig has front strap checkering.
I'm curious how many have you owned? What were/are they? What are you comparing it to?
Not trying to pick a fight, like I said I haven't ever shot one. Just wondering what you mean.
TTS wrote:I have one of the full size Sig 1911's and it is the most reliable 1911 I have ever owned. The odd slide shape makes it more difficult to find holsters, but everything else about the gun makes up for it.
They are both great guns from great companies, you can't go wrong with either. They are within $100 of each other on Budsgunshop.com.
ETA: The Ruger has a number of MIM parts where the Sig does not and the Sig has front strap checkering.
tazdevil wrote:TTS wrote:I have one of the full size Sig 1911's and it is the most reliable 1911 I have ever owned. The odd slide shape makes it more difficult to find holsters, but everything else about the gun makes up for it.
They are both great guns from great companies, you can't go wrong with either. They are within $100 of each other on Budsgunshop.com.
ETA: The Ruger has a number of MIM parts where the Sig does not and the Sig has front strap checkering.
I looked at that, and they're undercharging (MSRP) for the Sig, and overcharging (MSRP) for the Ruger!
How accurate is each, I've heard differing reports on the Ruger, not much on the Sig. BTW, this is not a two-tone Sig, it's all satin stainless. Both are 4.25 inch barrels.
TTS wrote:tazdevil wrote:TTS wrote:I have one of the full size Sig 1911's and it is the most reliable 1911 I have ever owned. The odd slide shape makes it more difficult to find holsters, but everything else about the gun makes up for it.
They are both great guns from great companies, you can't go wrong with either. They are within $100 of each other on Budsgunshop.com.
ETA: The Ruger has a number of MIM parts where the Sig does not and the Sig has front strap checkering.
I looked at that, and they're undercharging (MSRP) for the Sig, and overcharging (MSRP) for the Ruger!
How accurate is each, I've heard differing reports on the Ruger, not much on the Sig. BTW, this is not a two-tone Sig, it's all satin stainless. Both are 4.25 inch barrels.
Ruger show MSRP as $829
http://www.ruger.com/products/sr1911/models.html
connsolo wrote:
Weren't these originally around $650?
sawgrass wrote:I've read some good things about the Sig C3. There was one at Metro Pawn and Arnzens had one too.
Don't know if either are still there.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest