GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Discussion of handguns

GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby Spartan on Mon Jan 27, 2014 11:20 pm

I shot a new Glock 42 this past weekend ..........

42.jpg
42.jpg (5.88 KB) Viewed 8188 times


first, many know I am not a glock lover ... 2nd I don't love .380....
This was a nice gun. It fits the hand well, it feels balanced. it fit in my front jeans pocket. Controls were easy to deal operate.

I loaded the mag 6+ and stepped to the line at Target sports in Rogers. Bang I flinched remembering the LCP .... nothing bad ... no pain I jerked the first round low and left ..... I reset myself and gently squeezed the trigger ... bang and an 1" off the mark to the left ... no flinch actually a nice trigger .... handled well shot accurately ... just left 1/2" to 1' to the left at 25 feet. about 75 rounds ..... nice gun ... not nearly the felt recoil of the LCP or other snappy little .380s ...

I rate this 4 of 5 stars .....
User avatar
Spartan
 
Posts: 1076 [View]
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:22 pm
Location: Plymouth Rock

Re: GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby BigDog58 on Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:54 am

Thanks for the revue Spartan, I am thinking of getting my wife one of these to become her carry gun. It would also be used occasionaly by myself, if or when she is carrying her S&W 642. She originally wanted the S&W Body Guard in .380 but it was just too snappy. I also got a great deal on the 642.
I'm hoping someone does a revue on the Glock-41 as I am considering it to use as a competition pistol for myself. I love the 45 acp round, so I can qualify in the major class.
NRA RSO
"Never anger a man that can end you, from another zip code

If necessary to fight, I will Fight like I'm the 3rd Monkey on the ramp to Noah's Arc, and brother, it's starting to rain.
User avatar
BigDog58
 
Posts: 2680 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 2:03 am
Location: Edina, MN

Re: GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby catalyst686 on Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:47 am

Thanks for the review, I'll be waiting until a similar size 9mm version comes out. I'll replace my shield with that.
catalyst686
 
Posts: 181 [View]
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 4:59 pm

Re: GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby Thunderjohn on Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:37 am

Haven't shot it yet but here's a comparison to the XDs45,9
Image
FFL - http://www.Southwest-Arms.com
God, Family, Business
Emails to SouthwestArms@Gmail.com
Thunderjohn
 
Posts: 2369 [View]
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:23 pm
Location: Savage

GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby RJWesleyIII on Tue Jan 28, 2014 11:42 am

I got to play with one at keepers a few weeks ago. I really like it. I used my GSSF coupon already this year, so I will wait until next year to get a blue label one. It will replace my POS diamondback .380.


Sent from my iPhone 5 using Tapatalk
User avatar
RJWesleyIII
 
Posts: 301 [View]
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:08 am
Location: Stillwater, MN

GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby Ron Burgundy on Tue Jan 28, 2014 12:42 pm

Thunderjohn wrote:Haven't shot it yet but here's a comparison to the XDs45,9
Image

Awesome pic! Can't wait for the inevitable 9 using the same frame.
User avatar
Ron Burgundy
 
Posts: 981 [View]
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:28 pm

Re: GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby Randygmn on Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:01 pm

I was with Spartan at the range. He had a quite favorable experience. I too purchased a 42 earlier in the week. By the time we went on Sunday, it was my 3rd range trip with the little glock. I currently have 720 trouble free rounds through mine. It wouldn't run my current SD round, the Barnes xtp-sd cartridge. I ran 4 and they all failed to eject. I ran 20 corbons, perfectly.

The gun is accurate, soft shooting with an excellent trigger and positive reset. I've carried an 85f beretta for 20 years, and other than looks and capacity (8+1), the glocks got it beat. I feel like I'm cheating on my wife. This gun will sell like crazy. I paid $429

For those that think the 9mm will fit this frame, they are wrong. It will have to be a new frame. No way a 9mm cartridge fits into this grip. It will have to be re-engineered. No doubt, that process is underway. Currently, this gun weighs less than 16 ounces, loaded.
Randygmn
 
Posts: 901 [View]
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2013 3:52 pm

Re: GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby Evad on Tue Jan 28, 2014 2:41 pm

I never really minded the LCP for shooting. It'snot nearly as fun as bigger...but I didn't mind it.

When this comes out redesigned for single stack 9, I will look hard at it. As a .380 I don't personally have the need.

Thunderjohn,

Any chance you have an LCP in stock? I'd love to see that comparison, and a 19 and 26!

Scratch that-found comparisons:
Image

42 over 26:
Image
LCP over 42:
Image
Evad
 
Posts: 1054 [View]
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 9:21 am

Re: GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby Spartan on Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:47 am

I carry Sig 938 in 9mm ... or a Kimber ultra in 45... but this little glock is nice shooting gun. nice pocket gun ... its thin almost as LCP ...
User avatar
Spartan
 
Posts: 1076 [View]
Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 10:22 pm
Location: Plymouth Rock

GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby Erud on Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:53 am

Anybody have a comparison pic with a Kahr P380? I dig Glocks, but this still seems too big for a .380.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
User avatar
Erud
 
Posts: 2503 [View]
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 6:31 am
Location: SE Metro

Re: GLOCK 42 REVIEW

Postby ex-LT on Wed Jan 29, 2014 12:13 pm

Erud wrote:Anybody have a comparison pic with a Kahr P380? I dig Glocks, but this still seems too big for a .380.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't have one comparing to the P380, but this was posted in another thread about three weeks ago.
Image
DNR Certified Firearms Safety Instructor
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
NRA Certified Instructor - Pistol, Rifle, and Shotgun
NRA Endowment Life Member
MN Gun Owners Caucus Life Member
Member Post 435 Gun Club
User avatar
ex-LT
Inspector Gadget
 
Posts: 3470 [View]
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:49 pm
Location: Lakeville


Return to Handguns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron