gunsmith wrote:I have the Kel-Tec 380. Ruger LCP is a clone. about $225
Is clone fair? Probably. I would nit-pick and say Ruger often takes good ideas and makes them into good guns.
Ruger LCP = KelTec P3AT Fixed
Ruger LC9 = KelTec PF9 Fixed
Ruger SR22 = Walther P22 Fixed
I have a PF9 and it's been pretty good but has needed a little "tweaking". I've spent an hour or two doing the famous KelTec "fluff & buff"; which I'm sure is an hour or two I wouldn't have spent on a Ruger... Of course I saved a hundred or so buying a KelTec, so in a Ruger vs. KelTec debate I would ask: Do you have more time than money, or more money than time?
If you're on a budget, and willing to put some effort in, I recommend a PF9. Do the "fluff & buff", straighten the trigger and accessory rail a little, then test various ammo until you find ammo that doesn't work 100% and practice with that. Yeah, you read that right. My PF9 easily digests everything I have tried EXCEPT Speer Lawman. I told a new pistol shooter: "Grip it like you mean it, you're not trying to break it but you do have to be the boss of it." ...well I found out that Speer Lawman works only in my PF9 if I grip it like I'm trying to break it... then it works well. The PF9 gets a bad rap about being unreliable but with my reading and my experience it usually is shooter error. If you practice with it a LOT and really get into the habit of gripping it like you hate it, then it should be 100% reliable.
Or you could just buy a Ruger "clone" and not deal with any of that BS.
*I have very limited experience with the P3AT, about 3 magazines worth; and 1 single round out of the Ruger LCP.*My post is totally related to the PF9 and shouldn't be referenced in any way or used as a consideration for any decision. I make no guarantee as to the accuracy or fitness of any information contained within said post, if you listen to me you will probably die, etc. etc. etc...
Science: noun, Whatever answer will help to advance communism.