.
53 posts • Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
.
by OldmanFCSA on Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:26 pm
.
Last edited by OldmanFCSA on Thu Oct 06, 2011 7:54 am, edited 2 times in total.
- OldmanFCSA
- Posts: 3230 [View]
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 9:55 pm
- Location: Osceola, WI.
Re: Gun removal poll.
by White Horseradish on Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:10 am
OldmanFCSA wrote:neither of my two 50BMG rifles are styled or are used by the military
They are wood-stocked double rifles with exposed hammers?
"I have come to kick a** and chew bubblegum." <racks shotgun> "And I'm all out of bubblegum."
--John Nada, "They Live"
--John Nada, "They Live"
-
White Horseradish - Posts: 1748 [View]
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 2:46 pm
- Location: NE Minneapolis
Re: Gun removal poll.
by Pat Cannon on Sat Oct 01, 2011 12:11 am
Everybody knows it's only those evil .50 BMGs that the terrorists want. 
-
Pat Cannon - Posts: 3894 [View]
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:32 pm
- Location: South Minneapolis
Re: Gun removal poll.
by jgalt on Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:10 am
Since Heller has established that the 2nd Amendment does indeed protect an individual right to own firearms, now would be a good time to throw the whole militia clause back on the gun grabbers...
The first militia act (1792) explicitly stated that everyone mustering for militia duty must bring their own firearms & ammo, suitable for the common defense. This means that, at the very least, all small arms (including ammo) suitable for the common defense are explicitly protected and individuals must be allowed to "keep" them, on the off chance the 'reserve militia' (all males (citizens, in some states) capable of bearing arms who are not already in the active duty military, National or State Guards) is ever called upon for service...
The first militia act (1792) explicitly stated that everyone mustering for militia duty must bring their own firearms & ammo, suitable for the common defense. This means that, at the very least, all small arms (including ammo) suitable for the common defense are explicitly protected and individuals must be allowed to "keep" them, on the off chance the 'reserve militia' (all males (citizens, in some states) capable of bearing arms who are not already in the active duty military, National or State Guards) is ever called upon for service...
Re: Gun removal poll.
by farmerj on Sat Oct 01, 2011 4:42 am
Not quite the same.....
Both .50BMG's
anti-aircraft.....
An M16.
An AR50
IF you can hit a moving aircraft at 150+ miles per hour with a bolt action or even a semi-auto rifle that is greater than 1 miles away with a series of shots at less than 25 rounds per minute.....
DAMN dude....you best market that skill.
I still want an M16 some day.
Both .50BMG's
anti-aircraft.....
An M16.
An AR50
IF you can hit a moving aircraft at 150+ miles per hour with a bolt action or even a semi-auto rifle that is greater than 1 miles away with a series of shots at less than 25 rounds per minute.....
DAMN dude....you best market that skill.
I still want an M16 some day.
We reap what we sow. In our case, we have sown our government.
Current moon phase
Current moon phase
-
farmerj - Posts: 4801 [View]
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:11 am
- Location: The edge of the universe in the vertex of time on the space continuum of confusion
Re: Gun removal poll.
by xd ED on Sat Oct 01, 2011 5:48 am
When dumpling guns are outlawed....
How To Shoot Fighter Jets With Bavarian Dumplings And Win The War!
How To Shoot Fighter Jets With Bavarian Dumplings And Win The War!
LET'S GO BRANDON
Re: Gun removal poll.
by nyffman on Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:18 pm
There are actually quite a few anti's registered here. They're trying to stay anonymous. But we know who they are.
our quarrel is not about the value of freedom per se, but stems from our opinion of our fellow men … a man’s admiration of absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for those around him --Alexis de Tocqueville--
Re: Gun removal poll.
by Pat Cannon on Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:28 pm
It is also hypothetically theoretically possible that not absolutely everyone is answering seriously.
-
Pat Cannon - Posts: 3894 [View]
- Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:32 pm
- Location: South Minneapolis
Re: Gun removal poll.
by nyffman on Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:38 pm
By definition, an "anti" would answer yes to any gun confiscation/removal. 
our quarrel is not about the value of freedom per se, but stems from our opinion of our fellow men … a man’s admiration of absolute government is proportionate to the contempt he feels for those around him --Alexis de Tocqueville--
Re: Gun removal poll.
by R.E.T. on Sat Oct 01, 2011 3:51 pm
OldmanFCSA wrote:
Note: neither of my two 50BMG rifles are styled or are used by the military - so I'm safe .................... Ya Right !!!!!!!!
Are they legal in California?
Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the face of an uplifted knife. Oliver Wendell Holmes
Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you. Benjamin Franklin
Don't blame me, I voted for an American.
Make yourself sheep, and the wolves will eat you. Benjamin Franklin
Don't blame me, I voted for an American.
Re: Gun removal poll.
by mnblaster on Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:31 am
what is this poll even doing here, lock it.
the mob rules
NRA Life Patron Member
NRA Life Patron Member
Re: Gun removal poll.
by DeanC on Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:33 am
mnblaster wrote:what is this poll even doing here, lock it.
It shows there are at least 25 people registered here that have some fundamental issues with the second amendment.
Decrypt the points of departure and return your head slowly and you do not cancel your hair.
53 posts • Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests