chudrockz wrote:Ron Paul hasn't changed his mind in thirty years in Congress. No flip-flopper, he! And as far as that being indicative of lack of thought, well, there's no real REASON to change one's mind if one is correct in the first place.
rthib wrote:That is great to know if you are ever in a trivia contest, but we are talking about Presidential Candidates and Ron Paul is not going to be the candidate and if he ever ran would not win.
DeanC wrote:rthib wrote:That is great to know if you are ever in a trivia contest, but we are talking about Presidential Candidates and Ron Paul is not going to be the candidate and if he ever ran would not win.
He's got more money than Newt, Bachmann and Cain combined.
grousemaster wrote:DeanC wrote:grousemaster wrote:I know I've flip flopped on some of my political positions. If you're not critically thinking about things it's easy to never change your mind. If you're not changing your mind on at least some things from time to time then you aren't thinking.
For this citizen, gun rights are not "some things".
all the issues are important. We all know Obama is an anti.....yet he hasn't touched our gun rights.
grousemaster wrote:DeanC wrote:grousemaster wrote:I know I've flip flopped on some of my political positions. If you're not critically thinking about things it's easy to never change your mind. If you're not changing your mind on at least some things from time to time then you aren't thinking.
For this citizen, gun rights are not "some things".
all the issues are important. We all know Obama is an anti.....yet he hasn't touched our gun rights.
rthib wrote:chudrockz wrote:Ron Paul hasn't changed his mind in thirty years in Congress. No flip-flopper, he! And as far as that being indicative of lack of thought, well, there's no real REASON to change one's mind if one is correct in the first place.
That is great to know if you are ever in a trivia contest, but we are talking about Presidential Candidates and Ron Paul is not going to be the candidate and if he ever ran would not win.
The question is from the list of candidates who is the best - depending on how you define best.
chudrockz wrote:If anyone believes that ANYONE other than Ron Paul has a chance of being elected as a republican in 2012 will make ANY actual, real cuts in government spending, they need to turn off Faux News.
gyrfalcon wrote:chudrockz wrote:If anyone believes that ANYONE other than Ron Paul has a chance of being elected as a republican in 2012 will make ANY actual, real cuts in government spending, they need to turn off Faux News.
The Republicans are going to LOOSE the election if any of the other candidates are actually nominated.
chudrockz wrote:He will take TONS of votes of the ACTUAL anti-war (as opposed to the ones who just hate wars when Republicans are in charge of them) as he has since been shown to be even more of a warmonger than Bush was. And that's saying something.
chudrockz wrote:Well, if he gets the GOP nomination, there'll have to be some sort of bet, I imagine.
goett047 wrote:I don't give a damn who gets the GOP nomination Ron Paul is getting my vote.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests