Keith Ellison is a angry man

[White Horseradish]

And I still want to know why you want to redefine traditional marriage into this new and unnatural one-ma/one-woman thing.

[Cavscout]

True. But nature doesn't define numbers one way or another. I know most animals naturally go around f'ing in nature, but that doesn't make it a requirement of nature.

[NMRMN]

And I still want to know why you want to redefine traditional marriage into this new and unnatural one-ma/one-woman thing.

Polygamy has generally been the exception, not the rule.

[White Horseradish]

True. But nature doesn't define numbers one way or another. I know most animals naturally go around f'ing in nature, but that doesn't make it a requirement of nature.

Ok, then why talk about whether homosexuality is natural or not? Either nature is important, or it isn't. Can't have it both ways.

[White Horseradish]

Polygamy has generally been the exception, not the rule.

In the Bible it doesn't seem to be... Wives, concubines, all over the place.

[TommyMN]

Keep your hands out of my wallet, and your religion out of our politics.

[river_boater]

I don't understand why anyone really cares. They could be allowed to marry today and the sun will still come up tomorrow. It changes nothing for anyone except for those that would benefit from it.

[fjrdc]

I am truly ashamed that a petulant little whine-baby represents Minnesota , but the moobats elected the so what does one do? EFF'EM!

[NMRMN]

I don't understand...

Good place to stop.

[heavygunner]

Now he is against the National debt ticker, says its a political tool? WTF how do this morons get into office? I mean the debt is what it is, i cant spend more when i have less money coming in isn't hard to figure out. Isn't he a rag head anyway or i mean muslim

[river_boater]

I don't understand...

Good place to stop.

I understand this much: you're perfectly happy imposing your religious beliefs on everyone.

I wonder how you'd like having Sharia Law, for example, imposed on you?

[Cavscout]

True. But nature doesn't define numbers one way or another. I know most animals naturally go around f'ing in nature, but that doesn't make it a requirement of nature.

Ok, then why talk about whether homosexuality is natural or not? Either nature is important, or it isn't. Can't have it both ways.

It's not a REQUIREMENT of nature, unlike the male/female bit. I don't have any problem with multiple spouses (signif others) though.

[river_boater]

I don't have any problem with multiple spouses (signif others) though.

I do. One is enough.

[Heffay]

People with other species (animals) goes against nature just as much as homosexuality in my book. Why not allow all of it then?

Tell you what. You find me a sheep willing to sign a marriage contract, and I'll support its right to marry a person.

[Cavscout]

I don't have any problem with multiple spouses (signif others) though.

I do. One is enough.

A rephrase, I believe it's far better than gay marriage. I still think the best situation is (1) father and (1) mother.