This case is not about extraordinary weapons lying at the outer limits of Second Amendment protection. The banned “assault weapons” are not bazookas, howitzers, or machineguns. Those arms are dangerous and solely useful for military purposes. Instead, the firearms deemed “assault weapons” are fairly ordinary, popular, modern rifles. This is an average case about average guns used in average ways for average purposes.
Lumpy wrote:California has been claiming that a constitutionally protected right is incompatible with public safety. Finally a judge was willing to refute that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests