Olympic firearms response to New York state

Firearms related political discussion forum

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby MrVvrroomm on Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:18 am

Olympic Arms? LOL
May I assume you're not here to inquire about the alcohol or the tobacco?

Certified Glock Armorer

engnerdan wrote:First he beat me up on the price. Then he made me deliver it. Then he made me drive to Roseville to pick up my money.
User avatar
MrVvrroomm
Changed
 
Posts: 2266 [View]
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:10 pm
Location: Shakopee, MN USA

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby Thunder71 on Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:24 am

User avatar
Thunder71
 
Posts: 3096 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:43 pm
Location: SE

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby Rip Van Winkle on Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:22 pm

oneunder wrote:
Paul wrote:Or he just wants some attention to his company and props from the gun community for sticking it to the man.


I would like to think that he is being honest in this, and not trying to use the fear mongering and current political climate like that. But, I could (and probably am) wrong.

I'd be more impressed if they pulled out of California also.
I will never apologize for being an American.
Post 435 Gun Club
North Star Rifle Club
cmpofficer@post435gunclub.org
DR #2673
President's Hundred (#48 2018)
Certified NRA RSO
User avatar
Rip Van Winkle
 
Posts: 4237 [View]
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:04 pm
Location: Unfashionable end of the western spiral arm, Galaxy Milky Way

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby Vlad on Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:02 pm

There are a lot of folks that look down their nose at Oly. To the best of my knowledge they are one of few companies in the US that does the forging of lowers and their forgings are used by Olypmic, SGW, Tromix, Palmetto, Dalphon, Frankford, Century (old) (Per AR15.com) http://www.ar15.com/archive/topic.html?b=3&f=118&t=452298


I have a K8 that is consistant and accurate. Is it a run and gun set up(M4gery)? No, it is set up for distance and my comfort. It has never had an issue. I also have one in 45 acp that is an absolute hoot to shoot. For me it ties a carbine and pistol eating the same diet together and logisticly I have one less item to worry about. DId I mention it was fun to bump shoot from the shoulder ;) ;) the recoil is light enought that I will use it to introduce the platform from kids to adults that are recoil sensitive. On a side note, you can get a lower from OLY to go with their pistol calibers that will take glock mags. Pretty cool to have a carbine and pistol not only using the same ammo but the same mags as well...
http://www.Schleifleather.com For custom holsters that fit you and the gun, not to mention show off those Strad grips...

The cost of liberty is less than the price of repression."

--W.E.B. Du Bois,
American scholar and civil rights leader
User avatar
Vlad
 
Posts: 1086 [View]
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Central MN

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby sansooshooter on Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:09 pm

My first AR is an OLY that was used. Replaced $ 12 worth of mag catch and spring and was very reliable ever since. I have owned that rifle for 25 plus years.

We need more gun related companies to make public statements and to present a unified front. The politicals understand $$$$$$ !
sansooshooter
 
Posts: 418 [View]
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:33 am
Location: north of Andover

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby Thunder71 on Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:50 pm

Olympic Arms goes one step further:
http://gunssavelives.net/blog/olympic-a ... ertising/#

From their Facebook page:

Olympic Arms was recently asked to advertise in the FOP Journal; the official magazine of the Fraternal Order of Police. It is well known that the FOP is a staunch supporter of Gun Control, had backed the AWB under Bill Clinton, and supports the current AWB under consideration that was introduced by Diane Feinstein. The FOP was actually accredited as being one of the sources that helped prepare the language of Gun Control suggestions that were forwarded by Vice President Biden. Below is a copy of our response to the FOP Journal:


Please forward this email to every major principal in your organization.

AS:

1. The Fraternal Order of Police is on Congressional Record as having been a major supporter of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban.
a. http://books.google.com/books?id=ZGb80R ... an&f=false
2. As a matter of fact and record, the FOP is accredited with assisting VP Biden in formulating the language of the newly proposed ban:
a. http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012 ... 52546.html
3. Additionally, as a matter of fact and public record, the FOP is in support of the newly recommended Assault Weapons Ban introduced by Senator Feinstein.
a. FOP representatives were actually standing on the Stage during the presentation as a sign of "support".

THEREFORE:
Olympic Arms, Inc, manufacturers of AR15 type firearms, firearms that these legislators would call "Assault Weapons", will not be supporting in any way, shape, form or fashion, The Fraternal Order of Police, any organization that represents, supports, takes advertising dollars from, spends advertising dollars with, is in anyway related to, any individual who is a card carrying member of, or any person or entity in any way associated with the Fraternal Order of Police. Period.

Henceforth;
• Be assured that Olympic Arms will not rest in its efforts to educate our customers, fans and followers the extent of the hypocrisy committed by the FOP and FOP Journal (fighting to outlaw the firearms produced by the very companies they now solicit for advertising dollars…). You can also be certain that we continue to make every effort to properly educate the firearms consumer in general, of the same.
• Additionally, we will make continued efforts at assure that ALL firearms manufacturers are aware of the FOP's support to strip Constitutional Rights from Americans, and their support of further unconstitutional gun control legislation.
• We pledge to inform all of our customers the lengths that the FOP and associated FOP affiliates by proxy (which includes all your advertisers)are willing to go to in order to strip the American Citizen of their Constitutional Rights, while at the same time writing in exemptions to the same legislation to ensure that their members maintain those same rights they would have stripped from others.
• Your actions are the actions of a rogue organization supporting tyranny, not an organization sworn to uphold the laws of the land, to protect, serve and defend their constituencies.

Let it be know, that your actions are reprehensible and shameful.


http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/20 ... much-more/
http://www.guncite.com/aswpolice.html

Sincerely,

Thomas A. Spithaler
Sales & Marketing Dir.
Olympic Arms, Inc.
User avatar
Thunder71
 
Posts: 3096 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:43 pm
Location: SE

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby BigJnMn on Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:53 pm

Magpul needs to do the same right now. They are about to become felons.
BigJnMn
 
Posts: 52 [View]
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 10:42 pm

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby Hmac on Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:57 pm

BigJnMn wrote:Magpul needs to do the same right now. They are about to become felons.


Undoubtedly, Colorado HB2441 will be amended as it works its way through the process so that Magpul could still manufacture 20-30 round magazines. Now...whether or not they wish to and want to take that chance, that's another story.
User avatar
Hmac
 
Posts: 2599 [View]
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:51 am

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby Hmac on Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:59 pm

Thunder71 wrote:Olympic Arms goes one step further:
http://gunssavelives.net/blog/olympic-a ... ertising/#


Wow. I'd love to see other such companies follow suit.
User avatar
Hmac
 
Posts: 2599 [View]
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:51 am

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby Dutch on Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:12 pm

I applaud Olympic for their stance, regardless their reputation. Especially during times of statements from clowns like Rybak.
Men may argue forever on what wins their wars, and welter in cons and pros, and seek for the answer at history's doors, but the man with the rifle knows.
User avatar
Dutch
 
Posts: 259 [View]
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:51 pm

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby kollector03 on Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:14 pm

I'd buy an Olympic rifle today to support them if there were any to be had on the market right now.
You literally have to show up at a store when they are unloading their stock order to get an opportunity to purchase.
kollector03
 
Posts: 855 [View]
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:19 pm
Location: Burnsville

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby Thunder71 on Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:30 pm

I think Coyote Creek has one.


Posted from Tapatalk on my Galaxy Note II while using the restroom.
User avatar
Thunder71
 
Posts: 3096 [View]
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2011 9:43 pm
Location: SE

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby Hmac on Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:34 pm

Hmac wrote:
BigJnMn wrote:Magpul needs to do the same right now. They are about to become felons.


Undoubtedly, Colorado HB2441 will be amended as it works its way through the process so that Magpul could still manufacture 20-30 round magazines. Now...whether or not they wish to and want to take that chance, that's another story.



Just posted at M4C by a Magpul principle...

SPQR476 wrote:We're holding firm to the stance that if our employees, neighbors, and other responsible Citizens of CO can't own our products, we're not going to enrich the state by making them here.

We're continuing to make our appeals on the economic argument, since all others fall on deaf ears. We're in the 2-Minute drill phase, gents.
User avatar
Hmac
 
Posts: 2599 [View]
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:51 am

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby greenfarmer on Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:01 pm

Every manufacturer needs to stand up on this. DPMS, Bushmaster, Colt, Federal, Winchester. You name them. They all need to stand up, and flat out tell the government that if they enact a ban, they will cease any and all dealings with any law enforcement agency in the United States. I think if they did that, this would all come to an end. But the problem is, how can you get every manufacturer on the same boat? One will say, gosh, let everyone else do it, we can make big dollars if we take over all government contracts. It's virtually impossible.
greenfarmer
 
Posts: 343 [View]
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:43 am
Location: kinda by the SW Metro, but a little further out in the sticks.

Re: Olympic firearms response to New York state

Postby XDM45 on Wed Feb 13, 2013 6:24 pm

greenfarmer wrote:Every manufacturer needs to stand up on this. DPMS, Bushmaster, Colt, Federal, Winchester. You name them. They all need to stand up, and flat out tell the government that if they enact a ban, they will cease any and all dealings with any law enforcement agency in the United States. I think if they did that, this would all come to an end. But the problem is, how can you get every manufacturer on the same boat? One will say, gosh, let everyone else do it, we can make big dollars if we take over all government contracts. It's virtually impossible.


Glock would never do it. The money from the po po is too good. They would however have my unending respect for them as a company if they did that. Heck, even though I don't like Glocks, I'd buy one just on the general principle they did it.
Gnothi Seauton
User avatar
XDM45
 
Posts: 2904 [View]
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:01 am
Location: Minneapolis/Saint Paul, MN

PreviousNext

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron