but I do not have the time nor the inclination to discuss further today,
have iced Patron and cigar awaiting me on the boat....
it is afterall happy hour................

nite all..........

EJSG19 wrote:I lost the VoR title a long time ago
hammAR wrote:Bessy, illogical argument and full of holes,
but I do not have the time nor the inclination to discuss further today,
have iced Patron and cigar awaiting me on the boat....
it is afterall happy hour................![]()
nite all..........
rtk wrote:EJSG19 wrote:I lost the VoR title a long time ago
Who gave you that title?
user842 wrote:hammAR wrote:I would give them a budget and let them pick their own................
The argument for issuing everyone the same weapon/caliber has always been magazine/ammunition compatibility in a SHTF situation. That idea has some merit, although I doubt that needs comes in to play often.
goalie wrote:...it ends up on the freaking history channel like the LA shootout.......
tweener wrote:wow!
Lots of love for the M&P
So I have to buck the system and say XD in .40
Ambi, simple, better gun, and better looking (IMO)
JoeH wrote:Seriously, their choice of taser is more critical.
cobb wrote:I just read an article of a PD that was unhappy with the 9mm because of lack of stopping ability, but had original went with the 9mm because of it's high capacity. When they upgraded, they went to the .40 S&W but then saw their officers having problems qualifying with he .40, too much recoil for them to get use to. Because of this, there was a need for additional training and ammunition, which increased costs. As of late, they have gone to the .45 acp and found the qual scores to go up, some officers even shooting a 100% that had not or could not with the .40 S&W.
So I would again support a .45 acp as the cartridge, maybe in a S&W M&P.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests