hammAR wrote:EJSG19 wrote:What you can do though, is compare price points. Put a $500 glock up against a $500 1911 (pick your maker). If somebody would do that extensively, then I might pay attention. Comparing $500 guns to $1500 guns just isn't logical, and it exposes a person's ignorance if they believe they are making a legitimate argument by doing that.
Fair and straight forward reply....
and to support it I will put one of my $300 Norinco 1911 against any $500 Glock..........
winner takes all......

Ok. But we use only .45acp ammo that I load on my press, in the
secrecy privacy of my home
I bet we find a combo that the Norinco can't run, that my Glock can. You old hardballer you...
Alright to be serious for a second. Frankly I see the cheaper 1911's being more reliable right out of the box, than compared to anything in the $800-$2000 range. Seems like you pay either $500 or $3000 for a 1911 and it works. Anywhere in between and you are asking for trouble.
Then again, getting 1911 fans to be honest about how well their 1911 worked out of the box, with no work done or tuning of ammo, isn't always easy. This is not a shot at HammAr or anyone else. But I see lots of folks with stars in their eyes about whatever gun they happen to love. Then their objectivity goes right out the door when they start telling you how well it runs.