grimbeaver wrote:Wow Sam that seems a little harsh.
First time you read a post of Sam's?

grimbeaver wrote:Wow Sam that seems a little harsh.
Evad wrote:grimbeaver wrote:Wow Sam that seems a little harsh.
First time you read a post of Sam's?
Seismic Sam wrote:You're asking for legal advice on a forum that could you wind you up in even deeper water than the questions we get in here about what to do when you got a rap sheet and your P2Cgets denied?? Dude!! Seriously!!! You need serious legal advice on a number of fronts, which is gonna cost you a bunch of money, and even then you STILL have to work out a realistic business model that will net you some money at the end of the day. And past the legal issues, you will be in direct competition with Bill's, who rents out a HUGE selection of guns for an afternoon. Yeah, maybe we get a few people in here that say they bought a gun and now hate it, but are those numbers BIG enough to make a living with Bill's weeding out 75% of your prospects with daily rentals to begin with??
My gut says you'll never even generate enough money to cover your legal costs, much less show a profit.
Oh, and have you considered that WHEN another Sandy Hook happens, the ammo supply is going to zero and your business will go down the toilet for 6 months to a year??
You want to start cheap, work out the business model first and figure out what you would have to make to break even, and you WILL need to factor in how much of your business is getting pre-empted by Bill's.
Oh, and I got within a hair's breadth of leaving 3M and forming up my own startup for a product which now sells $600MM a year JUST in the US, and had the clinical feasibility done and the marketing numbers, so I'm not just guessing about this stuff.
xd ED wrote:You'd be transferring firearms to and from the various client individuals. with all the procedural responsibilities that entails. With firearms, possession is ownership.
s4oak wrote:xd ED wrote:You'd be transferring firearms to and from the various client individuals. with all the procedural responsibilities that entails. With firearms, possession is ownership.
How does a place like Bill's handle that? Seems like possession is possession, regardless of whether you remain in their building the whole time.
Q: To whom may an unlicensed person transfer firearms under the GCA?
A person may sell a firearm to an unlicensed resident of his State, if he does not know or have reasonable cause to believe the person is prohibited from receiving or possessing firearms under Federal law. A person may loan or rent a firearm to a resident of any State for temporary use for lawful sporting purposes, if he does not know or have reasonable cause to believe the person is prohibited from receiving or possessing firearms under Federal law. A person may sell or transfer a firearm to a licensee in any State. However, a firearm other than a curio or relic may not be transferred interstate to a licensed collector.
[18 U.S.C. 922(a)(3) and (5), 922(d), 27 CFR 478.29 and 478.30]
mrp wrote:s4oak wrote:xd ED wrote:You'd be transferring firearms to and from the various client individuals. with all the procedural responsibilities that entails. With firearms, possession is ownership.
How does a place like Bill's handle that? Seems like possession is possession, regardless of whether you remain in their building the whole time.
I don't think the legal aspect of renting the firearm would be a problem.
http://www.atf.gov/content/firearms-frequently-asked-questions-unlicensed-personsQ: To whom may an unlicensed person transfer firearms under the GCA?
A person may sell a firearm to an unlicensed resident of his State, if he does not know or have reasonable cause to believe the person is prohibited from receiving or possessing firearms under Federal law. A person may loan or rent a firearm to a resident of any State for temporary use for lawful sporting purposes, if he does not know or have reasonable cause to believe the person is prohibited from receiving or possessing firearms under Federal law. A person may sell or transfer a firearm to a licensee in any State. However, a firearm other than a curio or relic may not be transferred interstate to a licensed collector.
[18 U.S.C. 922(a)(3) and (5), 922(d), 27 CFR 478.29 and 478.30]
Harsh?? How many of you have ACTUALLY been ready to commit over half of a one million dollar inheritance to buying a patent back from a company for a product that would save 3,000 American lives a year?? I was, and if I had been able to pull it off my monthly income would have been more than the yearly income of the CEO of 3M, and that's no joke, and I ran the numbers. FYI, the product is MFE electrodes, which are the defib electrodes which are legally required in every AED in every airport, hospital, casino, and most public places these days, and the market is still growing expotentially. Look at starting a business, ANY business. Think you can do it without fire extinguishers on the premises?? Uhh, that's a big NO!!
We're at about the 40% market saturation rate for AED's, and the laws will force this market to get as big as fire extinguishers. Got stuff 10 years old that has all the financial data plotted out, and the reality has tracked very close to this 10 year old data, and if there's any difference, it's on the high side.
Seismic Sam wrote:Harsh?? How many of you have ACTUALLY been ready to commit over half of a one million dollar inheritance to buying a patent back from a company for a product that would save 3,000 American lives a year?? I was, and if I had been able to pull it off my monthly income would have been more than the yearly income of the CEO of 3M, and that's no joke, and I ran the numbers. FYI, the product is MFE electrodes, which are the defib electrodes which are legally required in every AED in every airport, hospital, casino, and most public places these days, and the market is still growing expotentially. Look at starting a business, ANY business. Think you can do it without fire extinguishers on the premises?? Uhh, that's a big NO!!
We're at about the 40% market saturation rate for AED's, and the laws will force this market to get as big as fire extinguishers. Got stuff 10 years old that has all the financial data plotted out, and the reality has tracked very close to this 10 year old data, and if there's any difference, it's on the high side.
So unless you have walked the walk and talked the talk up until the point I did, you can STFU about my attitude. And yes, it was so EASY doing my market research to find EMT's who would admit that patient X died because the defib electrode was DOA in the package when they put it on him, and by the time they got a 2nd one placed he was gone. It happens DAILY, and is totally preventable if you choose the right substrate metal to begin with.
And as far as this particular case, the LAST thing you want to do is market research with people on a gun forum who know a lot about guns, and have found the one they like. You need to hang out at Bill's for months, and listen to n00bs picking rental guns, and work up your business model from THAT. THOSE people are your potential customers, and NOT the people in here!!
Oh, and excuse me, but if you're a graduate from any MBA course, you'll know all this to begin with, and how to target and analyze your target market, and run the numbers, and do all the rest of this stuff.
So to get down to brass tacks with this business model, you're going to have to be able to offer something longer term that Bill's can't offer with daily rentals. That's almost a stopper right there, in that Bill's offers and obscene number of guns to rent, and they can afford to do this. Oh, and they offer ALL the POPULAR guns! Double stopper! Don't know what the business model is, but they can afford to plow probably 50 - 60 new guns into rentals, and sell them used, and make the rentals pay for the depreciation with money to spare.
So what can YOU offer down the line that they can't get at Bill's, even assuming there are no legal problems?? I'm not seeing a huge market in loaning out Ed Browns, Nighthawks, Guncrafters, and HiPoints to people a week at a time down the line. Probably the best market is longer term rentals of Glocks and M&P's, plus the compacts like Kahr and others. Those guns are at least cheap and easy to get, so your entry fee isn't huge.
That would be where I would focus my activities, and you would want to start with having hard sales numbers for those guns, and THEN maybe you would do a poll in here about the percentage of people in here who actually picked the wrong gun and got another one 6 months later, and I think that number is pretty low. You also need to distinguish between people who actually hated one gun and got another, rather than what most of us do, which is keep buying guns we like.
So that's what the coffee smells like if you're trying to start your own business, sunshine, and the realities are pretty hard and this is a competitive world, so you have to offer something truly unique and valuable if you're going to make a go of it. If nothing else, I'd talk to Michael Martin about his book, and see what you can learn from him about the feedback that he gets from tens of thousands or readers, and see if there's some key need that could be factored into the front end of the whole learning process about buying and carrying a handgun, and how gun renting might be factored into this initial learning process.
Oh, and you're very welcome for this free idea, and I doubt this combination would have been suggested by anyone else. Michael will probably want a cut, and you'd do well to try and learn from his own startup business effort.
P.S: Any unique new business idea springs from the imagination of someone who understands the market and the products in it, and has some one-of-a-kind insight into that market that nobody else has. You will NEVER get to first base asking other people for good ideas or critiques on your own thoughts out here on the internet. That ain't the way Hewlett, Packard, Bill Gates, or Steve Jobs wound up doing what they did. Inspiriation only comes from within.
Ron Burgundy wrote:Harsh?? How many of you have ACTUALLY been ready to commit over half of a one million dollar inheritance to buying a patent back from a company for a product that would save 3,000 American lives a year?? I was, and if I had been able to pull it off my monthly income would have been more than the yearly income of the CEO of 3M, and that's no joke, and I ran the numbers. FYI, the product is MFE electrodes, which are the defib electrodes which are legally required in every AED in every airport, hospital, casino, and most public places these days, and the market is still growing expotentially. Look at starting a business, ANY business. Think you can do it without fire extinguishers on the premises?? Uhh, that's a big NO!!
We're at about the 40% market saturation rate for AED's, and the laws will force this market to get as big as fire extinguishers. Got stuff 10 years old that has all the financial data plotted out, and the reality has tracked very close to this 10 year old data, and if there's any difference, it's on the high side.
Not a troll, I'm legitimately interested. Why didn't it work out? Sounds like an interesting product. At least you were able to walk away with a one million dollar inheritance. That's Mrs. Heffay kind of money.
Seismic Sam wrote:Ron Burgundy wrote:Harsh?? How many of you have ACTUALLY been ready to commit over half of a one million dollar inheritance to buying a patent back from a company for a product that would save 3,000 American lives a year?? I was, and if I had been able to pull it off my monthly income would have been more than the yearly income of the CEO of 3M, and that's no joke, and I ran the numbers. FYI, the product is MFE electrodes, which are the defib electrodes which are legally required in every AED in every airport, hospital, casino, and most public places these days, and the market is still growing expotentially. Look at starting a business, ANY business. Think you can do it without fire extinguishers on the premises?? Uhh, that's a big NO!!
We're at about the 40% market saturation rate for AED's, and the laws will force this market to get as big as fire extinguishers. Got stuff 10 years old that has all the financial data plotted out, and the reality has tracked very close to this 10 year old data, and if there's any difference, it's on the high side.
Not a troll, I'm legitimately interested. Why didn't it work out? Sounds like an interesting product. At least you were able to walk away with a one million dollar inheritance. That's Mrs. Heffay kind of money.
Long story, and the startup was blocked by a phony competitor in Louisiana who supposedly could defib a heart with about 1/10th the power needed for REAL defib, and this paralyzed the new products in the defib industry for a year and a half. Turned out to be a complete scam, and the two VP's did 7 and 8 years hard time, and the CEO got 14 years in orange pajamas. 3M's decision not to pursue the product was a LOT more reprehensible and short sighted, and I got the proof that everybody up to the VP level knew they were pulling the plug on 3,000 lives a year by not going through with this. This in a large part is what turned me into the bitter old man I am today.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests