Pat Cannon wrote:As I said elsewhere recently, when I was in college I don't remember anybody saying, "I can't decide between quantum physics and journalism".
Pat Cannon wrote:Federal law prohibits any person from possessing any type of machine gun.
Sigh.
And while a 24-hour surveillance operation continued for three days, authorities didn’t say much to neighbors about what was going on.
macphisto wrote:Pat Cannon wrote:Federal law prohibits any person from possessing any type of machine gun.
Sigh.
The sentence before that, too:On June 10 Banks was charged by criminal complaint with possessing an AR-15 machine gun.
I'd prefer to see good writing that doesn't further public ignorance; something like, "...an AR-15 semi-automatic sporting rifle illegally modified for automatic fire."
JFettig wrote:There is such thing as a select fire AR-15.
1911fan wrote:That used to be the semantics, an AR was semi, M16 was full auto. At some point, those lines have crossed, particularly when the military has had some semi or burst only models with the M16 designation.
White Horseradish wrote:1911fan wrote:That used to be the semantics, an AR was semi, M16 was full auto. At some point, those lines have crossed, particularly when the military has had some semi or burst only models with the M16 designation.
Oh, I know. But that applies to guns made that way. We're talking a conversion, which could be even a filed-down sear (nobody said it was a safe FA gun). In the same vein, does an M-16 with the FA parts removed stay an M-16 or become an AR-15?
White Horseradish wrote:JFettig wrote:There is such thing as a select fire AR-15.
Does it stop being an AR-15 if somebody modifies it to FA?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests