http://www.army.mil/-news/2009/04/10/19 ... ic-record/
Mark of the beast? Prove me wrong!
WWJD wrote:http://www.army.mil/-news/2009/04/10/19508-obama-announces-joint-virtual-lifetime-electronic-record/
Mark of the beast? Prove me wrong!
rose359 wrote:Instead of a dog tag, the government could embed a chip in a soldier, like a veterinarian embeds a chip in a dog or cat.
Is the biochip the Mark of the Beast?
The biochip technology was originally developed in 1983 for monitoring fisheries, it’s use now includes, over 300 zoos, over 80 government agencies in at least 20 countries, pets (everything from lizards to dogs), electronic "branding" of horses, monitoring lab animals, fisheries, endangered wildlife, automobiles, garment tracking, hazardous waste, and according to the experts – humans (which we’ll examine in detail later). To date, over 7 million animals have been "chipped". The major biochip companies are A.V.I.D. (American Veterinary Identification Devices), Trovan Identification Systems, and Destron-Fearing Corporation.
And according to most modern-day "prophecy teachers". . . the implanted biochip is the soon-coming, 666: Mark of the Beast.
Carpathian eh? I don't think so, The President* uses too many contractions.
WWJD wrote:Bar coded chip under your skin
rose359 wrote:Widge:
It is called incrementalism, and it is the way things get done. We have the technology and now Obama has discovered the need. Next step is to apply the technology to the need. He is not going to be the one to propose the solution, but he will be the one to make it apparent.
Five years ago who would have believed that the federal government would could fire the CEO of General Motors. Impossible, but it happened. That's not the end game, but a baby step on the slippery slope of socialism.
Good idea to have a beer, but let's not ignore what is going on around us.
rose359 wrote:According to factcheck.org, Obama is way off regarding when his e-records plan will be implemented and how much it will save. He is claiming that half the $2500/family annual savings will come from medical e-records and that it will occur in his first term.
Is he lying for fun or does he have another motive for pushing this plan?
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008 ... vings.html
reading dastardly plots into everything proposed by anybody on any subject
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests