Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Discussion of rifles, shotguns, and muzzleloaders

Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby Stradawhovious on Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:32 am

I walk past them all of the time in the store, ammo isn't terribly expensive, rifles aren't terribly expensive, and I've heard decent things about the caliber. I've been thinking about the 17hmr because I hear that out to 100yds (+) it is a relatively flat shooting accurate squirrel rifle. Anyone want to give me some opinions on the subject?
If you're reading this, there are better than even odds you are a d-bag.
User avatar
Stradawhovious
 
Posts: 11868 [View]
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: South Mpls.

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby macphisto on Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:11 pm

Before you go spending more money you don't have, let's think this through.

1. What need do you have for a rifle chambered in a non-reloadable, expensive (for rimfire) cartridge of such limited versatility?

2. Do you plan on hunting squirrels?

3. Are you trying to bridge the performance gap between .22LR and .223 (it's A LOT closer to .22LR)?

I guess I don't see the point aside from a possible novelty factor and will borrow cobb's favorite emoticon to sum up my feelings on the matter. :|



Disclaimer: In addition to not knowing what I'm talking about on a regular basis, I don't have any firsthand experience with this cartridge.
User avatar
macphisto
 
Posts: 5184 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 3:04 pm

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby Stradawhovious on Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:15 pm

macphisto wrote:I guess I don't see the point aside from a possible novelty factor



Do I need another reason? :?

Yes I would consider hunting squirrels in the future, they are delicious.

And let me worry about how much money I do and don't have. Thanks Mom.
If you're reading this, there are better than even odds you are a d-bag.
User avatar
Stradawhovious
 
Posts: 11868 [View]
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: South Mpls.

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby infidel on Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:17 pm

Strad, heavy and slow is the way to go. .22 over .17 any day. Real men like recoil.
“If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team.” - John Ashley

Disclaimer: Do not assume from this post, that I either agree or disagree with any other issue brought up in this thread.
User avatar
infidel
 
Posts: 2103 [View]
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby Squib Joe on Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:29 pm

macphisto wrote:2. Do you plan on hunting squirrels?


Or rabbits, fox, groundhogs, prairie dogs, crows, and (according to some) coyotes.
"The weight is a sign of reliability. I always go for reliability." - Boris "The Blade" Yurinov
User avatar
Squib Joe
 
Posts: 2778 [View]
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:15 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby Stradawhovious on Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:55 pm

infidel wrote:Strad, heavy and slow is the way to go. .22 over .17 any day. Real men like recoil.


I have rifles in other calibers...... .30-06, .223, .22lr but I don't know anything about this caliber. They seem to sell a lot of them, and it doesn't seem to be going away so I figured that had to be some allure to it. In my preliminary research, this platform has a better chance of a reliable headshot on a rabbit or squirrel at 75 yards than many .22lr do just because of the ballistics and for hunting small, small game a .223 might be overkill in a lot of situations. Besides, right now, it's more of a curiosity than anything else.
If you're reading this, there are better than even odds you are a d-bag.
User avatar
Stradawhovious
 
Posts: 11868 [View]
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: South Mpls.

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby cobb on Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:59 pm

I was leaning towards a .17 Mach 2 instead of the HMR. Cheaper ammo and would work well on little critters.
“Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result”. - Winston Churchill

RIVER VALLEY TRAINING
MN. DPS/BCA approved training organization.

http://www.RiverValleyTraining.com
User avatar
cobb
Moderator
 
Posts: 6651 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Mankato area, not in city limits

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby Stradawhovious on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:01 pm

cobb wrote:I was leaning towards a .17 Mach 2 instead of the HMR. Cheaper ammo and would work well on little critters.


I heard a rumor that the HM2 wasn't surviving well on the market due to lack of popularity. Is that true? If so, I would hate to have a rifle in a non-reloadable caliber with no mass produced ammo available.
If you're reading this, there are better than even odds you are a d-bag.
User avatar
Stradawhovious
 
Posts: 11868 [View]
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: South Mpls.

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby Ironbear on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:01 pm

"Justice and power must be brought together, so that whatever is just may be powerful, and whatever is powerful may be just.” ~Blaise Pascal~
User avatar
Ironbear
 
Posts: 2180 [View]
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 4:38 pm
Location: A nondescript planet in the Milky Way galaxy

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby cobb on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:10 pm

Stradawhovious wrote:
cobb wrote:I was leaning towards a .17 Mach 2 instead of the HMR. Cheaper ammo and would work well on little critters.


I heard a rumor that the HM2 wasn't surviving well on the market due to lack of popularity. Is that true? If so, I would hate to have a rifle in a non-reloadable caliber with no mass produced ammo available.

I think you are talking about two different calibers. There is the .17 Mach 2 and the .17 HMR, two different chamberings. I am not aware of the HM2, never heard of it before.
“Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result”. - Winston Churchill

RIVER VALLEY TRAINING
MN. DPS/BCA approved training organization.

http://www.RiverValleyTraining.com
User avatar
cobb
Moderator
 
Posts: 6651 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Mankato area, not in city limits

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby Stradawhovious on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:11 pm

cobb wrote: I am not aware of the HM2, never heard of it before.


.17 Hornady Mach 2

HM2. I was assuming that was what you were talking about.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.17_HM2
If you're reading this, there are better than even odds you are a d-bag.
User avatar
Stradawhovious
 
Posts: 11868 [View]
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: South Mpls.

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby cobb on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:18 pm

Stradawhovious wrote:
cobb wrote: I am not aware of the HM2, never heard of it before.


.17 Hornady Mach 2

HM2. ;)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.17_HM2


Officially never heard it called that. As far as wikipedia, anyone can post any information they want out there and I do not take it as the correct definition. In this case, this is a good example of it, no such thing.

Hornady's web site has no .17 HM2, they do have a .17 HMR and a .17 Mach2 though. ;)
http://www.hornady.com/store/17-HMR/
http://www.hornady.com/store/17-Mach-2/
Last edited by cobb on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
“Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result”. - Winston Churchill

RIVER VALLEY TRAINING
MN. DPS/BCA approved training organization.

http://www.RiverValleyTraining.com
User avatar
cobb
Moderator
 
Posts: 6651 [View]
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:47 am
Location: Mankato area, not in city limits

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby westberg on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:19 pm

Strad, I have the Ruger bolt action w/ Burris scope and ammo if you want to try it on your next range trip. I don't remember if I have the scope sighted in with my glasses or without. :lol:
User avatar
westberg
 
Posts: 4830 [View]
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 7:42 pm
Location: Wyoming, MN

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby EJSG19 on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:19 pm

My brother in law has one, likes it. But he doesn't have a .223 already (much less 2 of them like you do.) You said it already, its flat shooting and the cartridge has a functional use. In my unnecessary opinion, the .22 LR and .223's you have leave no funtional gap in your personal collection that the .17 would fill. I don't see that the .17 provides any advantage that is substantial over using the .22 LR or your .223. Not to mention you can probably shoot your .223 reloads just as cheaply, and have a more versatile range of uses in .223.

I'd spend the money on .223 components and then go hunt with my .22 and .223 for a few days. Given the choice between what you have and buying a .17.

But, they are neat little rifles, and if the "neat factor" is why you want it, then I'd be the last one to say don't buy another gun.

You'd also be the first person I've met who seriously hunts squirrels at 75 yards. When I go, this can be done at ranges less than 50 feet all day long. So do you just want squirrel meat or do you want to see how far away you can shoot them? (not to say you can't shoot something from far away, that is fun in itself.)

Oh, lastly. If you do go. Make sure you shoot that little bastard who wouldn't shut the Eff up on deer opener. I was real close to checking my sights out on that little guy.
EJSG19


"Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt."
User avatar
EJSG19
 
Posts: 3931 [View]
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 3:31 pm
Location: Greene Co, IA

Re: Pros and Cons of 17hmr

Postby Stradawhovious on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:22 pm

westberg wrote:Strad, I have the Ruger bolt action w/ Burris scope and ammo if you want to try it on your next range trip. I don't remember if I have the scope sighted in with my glasses or without. :lol:



Thanks! I will more than likely take you up on that, and if you want, I can borrow your glasses and set up that scope for you. :lol:

cobb wrote:
Hornady's web site has no .17 HM2, they do have a .17 HMR and a .17 Mach2 though. ;)


I picked up the lingo from the boys at GunStop, and only used Wiki as an example. I am aware of the fact that you can't trust everything you read on that sight. I assumed it was in accepted use, sorry! :oops:

EJSG19 wrote:
You'd also be the first person I've met who seriously hunts squirrels at 75 yards.



1. When have you ever know me to do anything seriously. Ever. ???
2. If you are capable of hunting squirrels at 75 yards, why wouldn't you? Seems to me that it would add a fun factor to it.
Last edited by Stradawhovious on Wed Dec 09, 2009 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you're reading this, there are better than even odds you are a d-bag.
User avatar
Stradawhovious
 
Posts: 11868 [View]
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: South Mpls.

Next

Return to Long Guns

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron