macphisto wrote:I guess I don't see the point aside from a possible novelty factor
macphisto wrote:2. Do you plan on hunting squirrels?
infidel wrote:Strad, heavy and slow is the way to go. .22 over .17 any day. Real men like recoil.
cobb wrote:I was leaning towards a .17 Mach 2 instead of the HMR. Cheaper ammo and would work well on little critters.
Stradawhovious wrote:cobb wrote:I was leaning towards a .17 Mach 2 instead of the HMR. Cheaper ammo and would work well on little critters.
I heard a rumor that the HM2 wasn't surviving well on the market due to lack of popularity. Is that true? If so, I would hate to have a rifle in a non-reloadable caliber with no mass produced ammo available.
cobb wrote: I am not aware of the HM2, never heard of it before.
Stradawhovious wrote:cobb wrote: I am not aware of the HM2, never heard of it before.
.17 Hornady Mach 2
HM2.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.17_HM2
westberg wrote:Strad, I have the Ruger bolt action w/ Burris scope and ammo if you want to try it on your next range trip. I don't remember if I have the scope sighted in with my glasses or without.
cobb wrote:
Hornady's web site has no .17 HM2, they do have a .17 HMR and a .17 Mach2 though.![]()
EJSG19 wrote:
You'd also be the first person I've met who seriously hunts squirrels at 75 yards.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest