John S. wrote:Was told it will shoot "AS GOOD" as any Kimber, but considerably less $$$$![]()
Wasn't that said about the Charles Daly 1911 when it came out?
John S. wrote:Was told it will shoot "AS GOOD" as any Kimber, but considerably less $$$$![]()
justaguy wrote:If its anything like a Kimber it should cost "considerably less". The best buy out there in 1911's is a SIG, dude.
RAGGED wrote:justaguy wrote:If its anything like a Kimber it should cost "considerably less". The best buy out there in 1911's is a SIG, dude.
Fixed that for you![]()
I too dislike Kimbers, are they total crap? Not at all, have they had issues? Yes, but so has just about every MFG. The thing that I think ruined Kimber for me is Kimber owners. They ALL seem to think they are gods gift to man kind and that more than anything annoys me, their undeserved following is frustrating.
EJSG19 wrote:JoeH wrote:mmcnx2 wrote:So does that mean it will have FTF issues as a standard feature just like a Kimber! Now if it shot better than a Springfield TRP then you'd have something.
Dude, you are a broken record. It seems as though every time the word Kimber comes up you post something derogatory and then tout Springfield. OK, we get it. You don't like Kimber.
Don't you know? One bad experience with one gun is now enough background to discount an entire brand of firearm. If one is bad, surely they all are.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests