What happens in the basement stays in the basement.
mnglocker wrote:There is no such thing as "Brandishing" in MN law.
Quick, everyone put that in your pipe and smoke it. Don't give the left any ideas on laws to add/write.
However, we do have terroistic threats, and 5th degree assault.
Bessy wrote:I should have specified this more clearly... you are correct, I was using the term to brandish to represent pulling out your gun and waving it around, not to describe what they would charge you with if you get it wrong. It is considered a use of force. That's what I was getting at. They are going to charge you with assault, what degree is highly dependent on what your gun is pointed at. They can always throw in "terroistic threats".
justaguy wrote:Who was this guys instructor?
Updated StarTrib Story wrote:The suspect did have a permit to carry his weapon in public, said police Sgt. Martin Sayre.
Officers pulled over and arrested the suspect. A loaded gun was found in the vehicle as well as his weapon permit.
John T wrote:I seriously doubt he had a permit! We'll have to wait before we speculate.
thunderoussilence wrote:I am under the assumption if someone sees my weapon,they call the cops that it could be interpeted as Terroristic threats ?
macphisto wrote:People interpret things the wrong way all the time, but there's a big difference between someone seeing your weapon and you showing them your weapon.
thunderoussilence wrote:I am under the assumption if someone sees my weapon,they call the cops that it could be interpeted as Terroristic threats ?
justaguy wrote:Who was this guys instructor?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests