Personally, I would choose a Glock for myself, but if I were buying for a department, I would go with a Smith & Wesson M&P in .40 caliber. They are reliable, simple guns, point naturally for most, and fit the hands of pretty much everyone.

Discuss.
user842 wrote:Let's not worry about costs of the firearms, just opinions on what would be best.
VikesFan1 wrote:Because it's cheaper than a HK.
engnerdan wrote:First he beat me up on the price. Then he made me deliver it. Then he made me drive to Roseville to pick up my money.
hammAR wrote:I would give them a budget and let them pick their own................
hammAR wrote:I would give them a budget and let them pick their own................
user842 wrote:user842 wrote:Let's not worry about costs of the firearms, just opinions on what would be best.
hammAR wrote:I would give them a budget and let them pick their own................
user842 wrote:hammAR wrote:I would give them a budget and let them pick their own................
The argument for issuing everyone the same weapon/caliber has always been magazine/ammunition compatibility in a SHTF situation. That idea has some merit, although I doubt that needs comes in to play often.
hammAR wrote:Military yes,
LEO, no.....in TSHTF scenario it would not work that way and they are not trained that way......
using that logic, then all LEO's in the state should carry the same weapon platforms/caliber.....
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests