by DanM on Sun Sep 26, 2010 4:17 pm
You get what you pay for. In my experience, hearing protection that costs less than about $100 is likely to be using something like the 'clipping' technology that the video demonstrated. More expensive hearing protection is likely to use better methods, and above about $200 you get some very good units. I'm treading the break point with Peltor Sport Tac's, but I followed a recommendation to replace the standard ear pads with gel-filled ear pads (from their aviation models) to increase the seal and therefore the passive noise reduction rating (NRR) of the base unit. You may not be able to do this with other brands. I can't remember all of the specific models I've tried/borrowed, but the performance has matched the cost.
Also, outdoor shooting seems less demanding than indoor. Rifle ranges usually have fewer shots fired, and the sound isn't reflected like an indoor pistol league. The video presented a near worst-case scenario for hearing range commands while firing takes place. If you are not going to be in that position, you may not need that level of performance. On the other hand, if you do find yourself indoors needing to hear range commands you may not be able to with lower performing units.
Bottom line: pay enough for the hearing protection that you need. Sighting in a deer rifle once a year - $20 passive cheapos. Most anything else - best that you can afford.
Last edited by
DanM on Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first.”
Thomas Jefferson