I would have a few more things to add, but I am on my way to teach a MN CCW class, and today we are going to focus on rapid clip changes.

(PS: Of course word police are needed. We do not want to be drawn into symbolic, but wrong use of terminology.)
dbl bbl daryl wrote: It just seems to kind of make the whole sign irrelevant in the first place.
phorvick wrote:Tom, I do not believe that there is any 3 strikes law on the violating the sign issue; I certainly have never heard of it (which may say more about my hearing than the law!). I will follow this thread to see if there are updates.
I would have a few more things to add, but I am on my way to teach a MN CCW class, and today we are going to focus on rapid clip changes.![]()
(PS: Of course word police are needed. We do not want to be drawn into symbolic, but wrong use of terminology.)
princewally wrote:dbl bbl daryl wrote: It just seems to kind of make the whole sign irrelevant in the first place.
That's a feature, not a bug.
phorvick wrote:...and today we are going to focus on rapid clip changes.![]()
(PS: Of course word police are needed. We do not want to be drawn into symbolic, but wrong use of terminology.)
Where's the word police on this one?
Pakrat wrote:phorvick wrote:...and today we are going to focus on rapid clip changes.![]()
(PS: Of course word police are needed. We do not want to be drawn into symbolic, but wrong use of terminology.)
Where's the word police on this one?
Where's the word police on this one?
Just don't start a discussion of "clips" versus "magazines".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests