Nyff that's part of his problem, the parodies and insults do and did give him personal satisfaction.
Personally I think that the order needed to be challenged but just about anyone else with a permit would have been choice to challenge it.
nyffman wrote:IF you think that was the only one you really have had too much koolaid? Not to mention all the time he spent on the parodies, etc , ad nauseum which could have been spent on earning money or doing things that give him personal satisfaction.
To answer your question, no. Not that it really is a question. Or even a coherent sentence. I have a feeling there is an insult in there somewhere, though.nyffman wrote:IF you think that was the only one you really have had too much koolaid?
I'm not sure what you're saying here. You don't approve of how Joel spends his time? Ok. So?nyffman wrote:Not to mention all the time he spent on the parodies, etc , ad nauseum which could have been spent on earning money or doing things that give him personal satisfaction.
EAJuggalo wrote:Nyff that's part of his problem, the parodies and insults do and did give him personal satisfaction.
White Horseradish wrote:To answer your question, no. Not that it really is a question. Or even a coherent sentence. I have a feeling there is an insult in there somewhere, though.nyffman wrote:IF you think that was the only one you really have had too much koolaid?I'm not sure what you're saying here. You don't approve of how Joel spends his time? Ok. So?nyffman wrote:Not to mention all the time he spent on the parodies, etc , ad nauseum which could have been spent on earning money or doing things that give him personal satisfaction.
gyrfalcon wrote:Over all I think Joel/Andrew and his cohorts did Joe an unintentional favor by ripping on him so much... Ever heard of the phrase "there is no such thing as bad publicity"?
White Horseradish wrote:To answer your question, no. Not that it really is a question. Or even a coherent sentence. I have a feeling there is an insult in there somewhere, though.nyffman wrote:IF you think that was the only one you really have had too much koolaid?
I'm not sure what you're saying here. You don't approve of how Joel spends his time? Ok. So?[/quote]nyffman wrote:Not to mention all the time he spent on the parodies, etc , ad nauseum which could have been spent on earning money or doing things that give him personal satisfaction.
White Horseradish wrote:gyrfalcon wrote:Over all I think Joel/Andrew and his cohorts did Joe an unintentional favor by ripping on him so much... Ever heard of the phrase "there is no such thing as bad publicity"?
I'm sure some people got to like Joe just because Joel doesn't. It's a bit simpleminded to do that, but it's their right.
WWJD wrote:To the detriment of other instructors, trying to increase the membership rolls of MCPPA 2003/2005 which Andrew so graciously updates via his avatar,
WWJD wrote:He sure has a real funny way of making friends and influencing people!
nyffman wrote: You seem to think he's the greatest thing since sliced bread for gun rights in MN. .
WWJD wrote:
We are the kiddie day care after all!
How does that Joel tag sit with permit holders, On this forum??
WWJD wrote:And using your same logic, some might think of you as a douche.! But simpleminded as simple does!
I am not quite sure what you are saying here, either. What is a "Joel tag"?WWJD wrote:Just asking for clarification here!??
We are the kiddie day care after all!
How does that Joel tag sit with permit holders, On this forum??
Where's Justa with a poll
"Joel slagged us off as a group of permit holders"
Doesn't matter one iota what he said,................. HE ******* DID IT!
And certain permit holders/instructors continue the division!
Rally around what flag? Boys??
White Horseradish wrote: Prior to this deal, it's really a private fight between him and you guys in the Joel Hate Club.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests