JoeH wrote:RobD wrote:mnlitig8r wrote:I have a great idea: Waive the attorney-client privilege and we can discuss what really happened.
Yes MNmike... please do.
+1 (I hope I spelt that write.)

JoeH wrote:RobD wrote:mnlitig8r wrote:I have a great idea: Waive the attorney-client privilege and we can discuss what really happened.
Yes MNmike... please do.
+1 (I hope I spelt that write.)
farmerj wrote:doesn't matter who your attorney is....
Ask for a receipt and tube of KY
gyrfalcon wrote:farmerj wrote:doesn't matter who your attorney is....
Ask for a receipt and tube of KY
+cigarette for when it's all over.
MnMike wrote: And I spelt "wayy" on purpose as in wayyyy expensive. Thats a lawyer twisting things. And IT DID sound more like car salesman B.S. trying to get money from someone who they thought was desperate enough to pay what they want. I know what I didnt hear is "We have a case, we can win this." Which is what should have been said.
lenny7 wrote:I'm not sure that it's necessary to come here and publicly bash Marc for his fees or lack of guarantee, particularly since he can't properly defend himself. You inquired, he responded, and it didn't work out. Fortunately for him, his reputation is strong enough that it will not suffer one iota.
The great thing is...there are a lot of choices out there for attorneys. If Marc didn't suit your needs or your budget, I'm sure there are others out there who will. I wish you luck.
mnlitig8r wrote:Nicely said, and thanks for saying it.
lenny7 wrote:mnlitig8r wrote:Nicely said, and thanks for saying it.
That's good for 10% off, right?
mnlitig8r wrote:lenny7 wrote:mnlitig8r wrote:Nicely said, and thanks for saying it.
That's good for 10% off, right?
10%? You should have held out for 25%!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest