yukonjasper wrote:I'm reading your posts on this and getting the feeling you are trying to discredit the notion that the current administration may be up to something. Simply because they have have circulated similar rumors in the past and may not have followed through, doesn't mean they mean no harm. They are talking for a reason and if we don't pay attention, we will only have ourselves to blame when unfavorable outcomes are a reality. I appreciate board members who keep up on topics and post what they find interesting/alarming. I don't wish to be asleep and want to make sure I'm tipped off to do my own research.
Yes, you are correct and you really got me on the spelling thing. Congratulations, that is another tactic to quiet the opposition - attack the form of the message, cast doubt on the person delivering it, thereby shaking the credibility of the content. Not sure what the spelling has to do with the arguement, but if that is where you choose to go..................Guilty as charged.
I get the feeling you are trying to raise the alarm repeatedly over things that really aren't there. Whom do you work for?
At any rate, according to the link I posted this has been brewing since January. And there was a comment period on the proposed rule. Where were you? What comment did you submit?
Where were the gun advocacy groups like the NRA?

Decrypt the points of departure and return your head slowly and you do not cancel your hair.