Zarrett testified that he used the Taser for two to three seconds after the woman refused to hang up her phone during a traffic stop.
Snowgun wrote:Zarrett testified that he used the Taser for two to three seconds after the woman refused to hang up her phone during a traffic stop.
Are we sure this is excessive force?
MrVvrroomm wrote:What time is lunch? I'm having a colonoscopy that morning at 1000. I'm sure I'll be hungry.
Keith81 wrote:I thought the reason for officers to have a taser was to have a non lethal way to stop a threat. Is a phone that threatening?
MrVvrroomm wrote:What time is lunch? I'm having a colonoscopy that morning at 1000. I'm sure I'll be hungry.
Keith81 wrote:I thought the reason for officers to have a taser was to have a non lethal way to stop a threat. Is a phone that threatening?
Snowgun wrote:You must not drive.
A phone has been scientifically shown to be MORE dangerous than alcohol when driving a motor vehicle, only twice as annoying and with no chance of getting lucky.
Pezhead wrote:Was it her brother who was just walking around the area where it just happened?
xd ED wrote:if the woman did in fact have a gun, she might have thought the police man would be interested in seeing it, and she may have been trying to show the gun to the police officer...
PileDriver wrote:xd ED wrote:if the woman did in fact have a gun, she might have thought the police man would be interested in seeing it, and she may have been trying to show the gun to the police officer...
At which point if I were said officer, I may have been inclined to put several into her as well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests