rukwikenuf wrote:UnaStamus wrote:What made you choose the PWS buffer tube?
i dunno about the OP, but i have one too. i chose it because of ease of install (no staking castle nuts or any other silly stuff) and i liked the QD mounts built in. i was intending on a run-of-the-mill Milspec tube and then getting a Troy endplate with QD mounts on it. then i figured the price difference, i think the PWS actually saved me a couple bucks. not a ton, but that was made up for wth the ease of install, as i said.
+ 1 I also liked the fact that it was fluted and numbered on the top so I can see what setting the stock is on through the hole in the top of my Vltor buttstock. The PWS also has the following features
1. One piece construction eliminating the castle nut and ensuring that when installed, the buffer tube cannot become loose.
2. Attachment system automatically indexes the buffer tube perfectly straight.
3. The bottom of the interior buffer tube extends a lip into the receiver, supporting the bottom rear of the bolt carrier, reducing the carrier tilt present in some piston systems.
4. A dead blow buffer is securely installed in the rear of the buffer tube to reduce carrier speed by an average of 10%, and dramatically reduce felt recoil.
5. Two QD sling swivel attachments are machined into the front of the buffer tube allowing ambidextrous connection of your QD slings.
6. The buffer tube is fluted to allow debris to be pushed out of the way, and a drain hole has been placed in the bottom of the tube, allowing for draining of water when the rifle is parallel to the ground.
Everything you need to know to be successful in the military: Always have an Assault element,Support element and a Security element. Leadership Decisions: Will it accomplish the Mission? Is it morally and ethically correct? How will it affect your men?