The Lance wrote:Stradawhovious wrote:The Lance wrote:That to me is worth it. As It affects me very little
Then give them a list of your weapons, but leave me out of it.
I understand that not everyone agrees with me. It's not that big of a deal. I learned some new insights on what you and the other members have said and you are right it makes perfect sense. I'm not an illogical gun control activist. With what everyone said yes a national registry isn't a good idea. But I still think that the private sale loophole needs to be closed. If it prevents one or two badguys from getting their guns to me its worth it. I understand some people like Holmes just want to see the world burn and nothing I stated could have prevented what he did. I already said that was true earlier..
I'm not an inflexible person that refuses to change his mind. I do think that more people need to carry. If two or three people in the theater had their weapons on them the death toll might have been lessened, including the fact Holmes was wearing full riot gear. If anything and I'm sure all of us can agree that kind of stuff should be banned in general. Make it absolutely illegal for anyone to posses that. Think about it, once again I'm probably seen as a moron but really? Do you need riot gear and ballistic resistant gear in your daily life? Unless you plan on getting into some sort of shootout.. (Playing Devils Advocate again)
Banning guns is never the answer.. It's in our history and its a part of the american tradition.
Also to point out I did was Obama's address today live on TV and to his credit not once did he mention the word "Gun" Please Discuss..
But I still think that the private sale loophole needs to be closed. If it prevents one or two badguys from getting their guns to me its worth it. I understand some people like Holmes just want to see the world burn and nothing I stated could have prevented what he did. I already said that was true earlier..
Describe this "...private sale loophole..." you speak of, the general terms of the law you would propose, and how it would prevent a law breaker from attaining a firearm through illicit means.
Obama's address today live on TV and to his credit not once did he mention the word "Gun" Please Discuss
The only way he could have used the word "gun" would be if it were preceded, or succeeded by the word 'control'. He understands that among his base, he would loose far more than any gain he might incur.