Seismic Sam wrote:And finally, I will add my usual rant about digital scales, which can be unreliable and/or inaccurate. I have a Cabela's $85 digital scale that has a plastic measuring pan that can generate enough static electricity to make the powder particles cling to the pan, and it has a brutal zero drift of about half a grain a minute, so if you weigh the powder 2 minutes after you zero the scale, your weight will be a grain higher than it actually is...
Seismic Sam wrote:When it launches, the marketing will hit you in the face like the shrapnal from a methane explosion in a 3 holer outhouse!!![]()
![]()
bulletproof wrote:Don't trust the Lee Safety Scale, it's junk. Worst product Lee makes IMHO.
If anyone disagrees I have one to sell.
Bulldog1856 wrote:...Lee states that the .61 disc should give me 5.6 grains. i weigh it out using my hornady digital scale and i am consistantly getting 4.9 grains.the Lee safety scale is telling me almost the same thing. Should i increase the auto disc trusting the scale or trust the disc? I have a feeling the 20 rounds i have loaded will have to be pulled as i suspect they are undercharged.
Bulldog1856 wrote:5.5 grains is the starting charge listed. I doubt it would cycle correctly as low as it was. I was going for soft loads but that was too low.
Bulldog1856 wrote:5.5 grains is the starting charge listed. I doubt it would cycle correctly as low as it was. I was going for soft loads but that was too low.
Seismic Sam wrote:When it launches, the marketing will hit you in the face like the shrapnal from a methane explosion in a 3 holer outhouse!!![]()
![]()
Return to Ammunition & Reloading
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests