While I can appreciate the much more active presence of our overlords, I can't help but think their recent proclivity for warnings with sparse or nonexistent explanation is somewhat counterproductive. 
I received 2 warnings recently. Descriptions: you know what you did, or read the rules. First one was a bump < 72 hours where I updated the package deal. No problem, my bad. I read the rules and apologized. 
The latest? I haven't a clue. 
Warning: read the rules
With a link that when clicked talks me I can't read it 
Look, we have a lot of rules and without some clue I can't even figure out the subject, let alone the rule or how I broke it. 
Maybe quote the infraction?
			

