tazdevil wrote:The 357 sig round sounds interesting, I need to go try it out someday.
This is really the heart of what I was after!
If you would ... why do you believe it is, that you find .357 Sig more "interesting" than .40?!

tazdevil wrote:The 357 sig round sounds interesting, I need to go try it out someday.
Holland&Holland wrote:I think there is onely one person in this thread who feels strongly one way or the other and it is the OP. If you want to argue maybe try politics. I can not see anywhere where anyone said .357 sig was the bees knees of selfdefense and if you carry anything else you are dead other than you of course.
Stradawhovious wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:I think there is onely one person in this thread who feels strongly one way or the other and it is the OP. If you want to argue maybe try politics. I can not see anywhere where anyone said .357 sig was the bees knees of selfdefense and if you carry anything else you are dead other than you of course.
.357 sig is the bees knees of selfdefense and if you carry anything else you are dead.
There. I just made things interesting.
You're welcome.
Holland&Holland wrote:Stradawhovious wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:I think there is onely one person in this thread who feels strongly one way or the other and it is the OP. If you want to argue maybe try politics. I can not see anywhere where anyone said .357 sig was the bees knees of selfdefense and if you carry anything else you are dead other than you of course.
.357 sig is the bees knees of selfdefense and if you carry anything else you are dead.
There. I just made things interesting.
You're welcome.
And a new era of debate begins... Move over 9mm vs. .45, move over Glock vs. 1911, Move over Republican vs. Democrat, the new debate in town is can .357 Sig cure cancer? Is it the answer for world hunger? If fired in rapid succession into the ground with the user acheive personal space travel? Stay tuned because teh .357 Sig is the Bee's Knees !
rugersol wrote:tazdevil wrote:The 357 sig round sounds interesting, I need to go try it out someday.
This is really the heart of what I was after!
If you would ... why do you believe it is, that you find .357 Sig more "interesting" than .40?!
tazdevil wrote:rugersol wrote:tazdevil wrote:The 357 sig round sounds interesting, I need to go try it out someday.
This is really the heart of what I was after!
If you would ... why do you believe it is, that you find .357 Sig more "interesting" than .40?!
Because of what was posted earlier about the recoil being less than the 40, I'd like to evaluate that myself. I've fired 9's that hurt to shoot, 45's that were a dream (and vice-versa), 40's that I thought in general where all about how much noise they can make and how snappy they can get. That's my personal nonprofessional idiotic opinion, yours may vary greatly.
tazdevil wrote:rugersol wrote:tazdevil wrote:The 357 sig round sounds interesting, I need to go try it out someday.
This is really the heart of what I was after!
If you would ... why do you believe it is, that you find .357 Sig more "interesting" than .40?!
Because of what was posted earlier about the recoil being less than the 40, I'd like to evaluate that myself. I've fired 9's that hurt to shoot, 45's that were a dream (and vice-versa), 40's that I thought in general where all about how much noise they can make and how snappy they can get. That's my personal nonprofessional idiotic opinion, yours may vary greatly.
gunforhire wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:Stradawhovious wrote:
.357 sig is the bees knees of selfdefense and if you carry anything else you are dead.
There. I just made things interesting.
You're welcome.
And a new era of debate begins... Move over 9mm vs. .45, move over Glock vs. 1911, Move over Republican vs. Democrat, the new debate in town is can .357 Sig cure cancer? Is it the answer for world hunger? If fired in rapid succession into the ground with the user acheive personal space travel? Stay tuned because teh .357 Sig is the Bee's Knees !
you asked for it bub![]()
Also, .40 Short and weak is the way to go. Why? Because, Glock!
tazdevil wrote:gunforhire wrote:Holland&Holland wrote:And a new era of debate begins... Move over 9mm vs. .45, move over Glock vs. 1911, Move over Republican vs. Democrat, the new debate in town is can .357 Sig cure cancer? Is it the answer for world hunger? If fired in rapid succession into the ground with the user acheive personal space travel? Stay tuned because teh .357 Sig is the Bee's Knees !
you asked for it bub![]()
Also, .40 Short and weak is the way to go. Why? Because, Glock!
Ahem (clears throat) Glocky shooty .357Sig as well there. I still have not shot a Glock. I just can't get past the uber-ugliness (there is that "tupperware" thing too).
rugersol wrote:tazdevil wrote:rugersol wrote:
This is really the heart of what I was after!
If you would ... why do you believe it is, that you find .357 Sig more "interesting" than .40?!
Because of what was posted earlier about the recoil being less than the 40, I'd like to evaluate that myself. I've fired 9's that hurt to shoot, 45's that were a dream (and vice-versa), 40's that I thought in general where all about how much noise they can make and how snappy they can get. That's my personal nonprofessional idiotic opinion, yours may vary greatly.
Thanks!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests